Exploring How Legal Identity Tools Become Vehicles for Illicit Finance—and What Regulators, Banks, and Clients Must Do Next
VANCOUVER, B.C. — As international finance evolves in complexity and regulatory intensity, the banking passport—a once-obscure identity solution for legitimate financial access—has come under scrutiny for its misuse in tax evasion, illicit capital flows, and regulatory arbitrage.
While legally issued and often fully compliant on the surface, these structured identity tools are increasingly being leveraged to obscure beneficial ownership, avoid transparency, and exploit loopholes in global financial oversight.
This press release examines how some actors exploit banking passports, the growing regulatory crackdown, and the implications for individuals and institutions that use them, whether legitimately or otherwise.
It also examines the steps leading service providers like Amicus International Consulting are taking to restore trust in the tool through ethical, legal, and transparent frameworks.
Understanding the Banking Passport’s Legal Foundations
A banking passport is not a travel document but a composite identity system enabling cross-border financial access. It typically includes:
- A legally issued Tax Identification Number (TIN)
- Proof of legal residency or investment-based citizenship
- Full KYC/AML documentation
- FATCA/CRS self-certification paperwork
Properly structured, these documents enable individuals to operate globally with complete legal alignment. However, in the hands of unethical operators or ill-intentioned clients, they can become instruments of financial subterfuge.
How Banking Passports Are Abused
1. Layering Identities to Obscure Beneficial Ownership
Bad actors utilize multiple banking passports across different jurisdictions to create a complex web of shell companies and nominee structures. This tactic, called layering, makes it difficult for authorities to trace funds back to the actual owner.
2. Shopping for Non-Cooperative Jurisdictions
While most CRS- and FATCA-participating nations now require disclosure, some jurisdictions remain lightly regulated or only partially cooperative, allowing banking passport holders to:
- Omit secondary citizenship
- Open accounts using only partial documentation
- Avoid the exchange of account information
3. Stacking Residencies to Circumvent Reporting
Unscrupulous consultants may offer clients the opportunity to “stack” residencies in multiple countries, allowing them to avoid declaring a primary tax residence. This technique allows clients to evade CRS reporting by claiming they don’t meet the residency threshold in any one nation.
4. Misusing Nominee Structures
In violation of most AML and FATF guidelines, some banking passport structures are paired with nominee shareholders or directors to obscure absolute control over funds and accounts. While these structures may be technically legal, they are often used to dodge accountability.
Case Study 1: Abuse of the Vanuatu Citizenship Program
In 2022, an Eastern European money laundering syndicate acquired Vanuatu citizenship through fast-track donations. Using these passports, they gained banking access in Hong Kong, established shell companies in the British Virgin Islands, and funnelled illicit proceeds from cryptocurrency scams into accounts in Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates.
Because Vanuatu was not sharing FATCA/CRS data in real-time and banks relied only on passport information, beneficial ownership remained hidden for years. The scheme unravelled only after an Interpol investigation uncovered the trail.
This case prompted EU-wide blocklisting of Vanuatu’s CBI program and forced banks to refuse Vanuatu-linked identities without secondary verification.
Gray Area or Illegality? When Legal Isn’t Ethical
While some abuse crosses into criminal territory, other uses remain in a regulatory gray zone, including:
- Using a legal banking passport to pay fewer taxes under territorial rules
- Moving funds from a sanctioned country using a second nationality
- Operating a foreign business through a legal entity tied to a residency-by-investment program
- Using a different TIN to access a financial institution that would otherwise reject you
These behaviours may be legal in isolation, but when patterns suggest intention to mislead, they trigger scrutiny under AML standards.
Regulatory Responses: The Walls Are Closing In
1. Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) on Secondary Passports
As of 2025, banks in Switzerland, Luxembourg, and Singapore now require:
- Declaration of all tax residencies and citizenships
- Submission of travel history over the last 12 months
- Verification of physical presence requirements tied to residency permits
- Enhanced scrutiny of banking passports issued via investor programs
2. AI-Based Pattern Recognition
Regulators are deploying tools that detect:
- Irregular identity overlaps
- Multi-residency declarations that don’t match income sources
- High-frequency IP shifts during online banking sessions
- Documents that match other flagged identities
3. Public Disclosure Demands
Some nations are pushing for public beneficial ownership registries, where all accounts tied to banking passports must declare:
- Ultimate beneficial owner (UBO)
- Control thresholds
- Structure history and registration chain
Case Study 2: Legal Residency, Ethical Evasion
A North African investor obtained residency in Georgia—a CRS participant withfavourablee tax policy—and used it to open accounts in the UAE. He earned income through an EU-based consulting business but reported all foreign revenue under Georgia’s territorial tax rules, paying little tax.
While this strategy was technically legal, French regulators later flagged the structure as “economic fiction” because the investor had no real presence in Georgia. This prompted an audit, reputational damage, and eventual account restrictions.
The Amicus Response: Ethics, Transparency, and Compliance
Amicus International Consulting is among the few firms setting clear boundaries around legal banking passport usage. Their approach includes:
1. Jurisdictional Integrity Vetting
Amicus no longer offers banking passport services through:
- Non-CRS jurisdictions
- Countries on the FATF greylist or blacklist
- States lacking MLAT agreements with client’s origin countries
2. Multi-TIN Disclosure Mandates
Every Amicus identity structure includes:
- Full declaration of all citizenships and residences
- Disclosure of all prior and pending TINs
- FATCA W-9 or equivalent self-certification as applicable
3. Compliance-First Identity Engineering
Rather than obscuring identity, Amicus builds structures designed to be:
- Audit-resilient
- Biometrically traceable
- Voluntarily disclosable
- Legally durable across jurisdictions
An Amicus employee explained:
“Our goal isn’t to hide clients—it’s to protect them legally. That means full transparency, traceable documentation, and staying ahead of compliance shifts.”
Case Study 3: Rebuilding Trust After Abuse
In 2023, a U.S. dual citizen using a Caribbean-issued banking passport was flagged in Switzerland for failing to declare U.S. residency under FATCA. His account was frozen, and the bank filed a suspicious activity report (SAR).
Amicus intervened to:
- Refile all U.S. forms under a Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (VDA)
- Secure legal residency in Portugal to replace the Caribbean passport
- Onboard the client at a new EU financial institution under full CRS alignment
- Provide a legal memorandum verifying beneficial ownership to satisfy onboarding
The client regained financial access—this time with a compliant, ethical identity structure.
Warning Signs of a Problematic Banking Passport
Amicus flags the following behaviors as high-risk:
- Using “residency” in countries you’ve never visited
- Omitting CRS/FATCA disclosures on account applications
- Acquiring multiple TINs without clear jurisdictional logic
- Paying no taxes anywhere while claiming multiple residencies
- Relying on blacklisted service providers or shell firms
Even if not illegal, these practices can trigger denial, de-risking, or even prosecution when financial institutions or governments suspect intent to evade oversight.
Toward a Responsible Future
Banking passports, when used properly, are vital tools for international financial participation—especially for individuals in high-risk jurisdictions or volatile economies. But their misuse threatens the legitimacy of the tool itself.
To protect the right to financial privacy, access, and cross-border mobility, Amicus calls on:
- Banks to improve training on identity layering risks
- Regulators to standardize compliance checks for all residency-linked TINs
- Clients to demand ethical, transparent advisory services
- Service providers to build structures that assume audit, not evade it
📞 Contact Information
Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402
Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca
Follow Us:
🔗 LinkedIn
🔗 Twitter/X
🔗 Facebook
🔗 Instagram
About Amicus International Consulting
Amicus International Consulting is a leading provider of legal identity solutions, financial access strategies, and compliance-first banking passport frameworks. With expertise across more than 60 countries, Amicus builds lawful, ethical structures for clients navigating cross-border banking, privacy, and global regulatory landscapes.
