Google Reader has been dead for a decade but is not forgotten, One of them should not be waiting in line for time on the supercomputer !!!
On March 13, 2013, ten years ago, Google announced that it would be discontinuing Google Reader, a well-liked application for reading RSS and Atom feeds.
A petition to save the application was started, but it was unsuccessful, following Google’s decision to do so as part of a corporate initiative known as Spring Cleaning. The company asserted that the declining use of the 2005-launched web app led to its termination on July 1, 2013.
In an interview with The Register, software developer Dave Winer stated that RSS was not the cause of Reader’s demise. Winer was involved in the development of RSS.
Winer elaborated, At the time, the two founders of the company, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, believed that they had too many products. Additionally, they requested that the business eliminate some of the products.
Because they have users and people who build on these products, this is a very difficult thing for a company to do. They use the products in the company and use them to build systems. There are numerous reasons why you must commit to maintaining a product after it has been released.
However, the founders responded, No, we don’t have that commitment. We will learn how to destroy products.’ As a result, they asked everyone in the company, Look, which products should we kill? The only one any gathering could concur with was Peruser. So they said, ‘Fine, we will erase Peruser and we will see what occurs.’ What’s more, that was the finish of that.
Developer Marco Arment framed the decision a decade ago as a result of Facebook’s rise, which sought to control content on its platform in order to monetize those who viewed it, and Google’s attempt to respond with its own social network, Google+.
Google Reader is just the most recent casualty in the war that Facebook started, which appears to have started by accident: Arment wrote, the struggle to own everything.
Internet users can curate and aggregate their own collection of content from multiple sources using an RSS reader app. In order to build an audience and make money selling ads, social media platforms would rather handle the aggregation and curation of content on their own.
Depending on who you ask, RSS refers to RDF Site Summary, Really Simple Syndication, or nothing at all. Websites can publish RSS feeds in this XML-based format to syndicate their content. After that, individuals or services can subscribe to any of these feeds to be notified whenever new content is published.
Winer began publishing an XML version of his blog, Scripting News, in December 1997. The scriptingNews> format was used by other websites. In Walk 1999, Netscape sent off MyNetscape. Com, employing RSS 0.9, an XML syndication format. My by April UserLand. The following month, Com adopted the technology and scriptingNews> 2.0b1 format. RSS 0.91 and My were both released by Netscape in July. UserLand. Com backed it.
RSS 1.0 marked the next step in the spec’s development, which was followed by Atom, another XML-based spec. In 2005, Atom went live, one year after Facebook did.
RSS usage has decreased due to efforts made by Facebook, Google, and others to bring people together on a single platform rather than divert them. In 2018, Mozilla discontinued support for RSS in Firefox. In 2019, Apple stopped providing Apple News with RSS. Additionally, RSS feeds were removed from Google Groups in 2021.
Winer gives Google some credit for what the organization achieved with Peruser.
He stated, Nobody saw a downside when Google Reader came in. The reality is that the RSS market was extremely disorganized at the time, and Google organized it in a sort of beneficial manner.
Be that as it may, Winer’s appreciation has limits. He stated that Google could have handled RSS in a much more considerate manner, but they did not. They are currently doing the same thing with the internet. It’s amazing. They are affecting the entire internet. They’ve hyped it up a lot and are moving slowly. They make it sound as they’re doing beneficial things. However, in actuality, what they are doing is reducing the web to the portion that they can monetize.
Winer added: Nonetheless, it would have been nice if Google had demonstrated good corporate citizenship by stating, Look, we just left a big oil spill here. We are aware of that, and as a responsible business, we will contribute to its cleanup. There was nothing like that.
Nevertheless, a segment of internet users who are technically obstinate continue to use RSS extensively for podcasts. Additionally, recent signs indicate renewed interest. Chrome on Android now supports RSS, out of all the companies. Additionally, as a result of Twitter’s new, contentious management, a large number of bird site users have created accounts on the federated Mastodon network, which supports RSS feeds.
Winer said that Mastodon does a great job with RSS, but he doesn’t think it can change the way people think about centralized services.
He stated, Mastodon is not for everyone, noting that it is not sufficiently user-friendly. It experiences the same issue as the RSS. [ In contrast, Twitter’s subscriptions are utterly simple. Why has RSS never been easier to subscribe to? It was because nobody wanted to work together.
I have the impression that we have not yet solved the problem of how to commoditize Twitter and remove it from the realm of, say, silos and walled gardens.
It’s continuously going to be exceptionally difficult to get dispersed networks to happen in fact.
He said that the fact that power users typically find a way out is the only thing that makes him optimistic.
He stated, They give you a system that, you know, has training wheels – all the hard work is done for you and you give up your freedom. It has always been that way… It may be the purpose of this Mastodon thing.
Our Other Related Reports:
Ecological Board Furniture Market Essential Business Expansion Strategies and Key Players 2023-2028
Outdoor Inflatable Tent Market Essential Business Expansion Strategies and Key Players 2023-2030
