EXPOSED: The Iron Triangle of Harris County – An Exhaustive Investigation into Alleged Systemic Judicial, Corporate Collusion, and Discrimination

The architecture of modern civil justice is ostensibly predicated upon the fundamental promise of impartial arbitration, the unassailable integrity of public records, and the equal protection of all citizens under the law. However, when the mechanisms of justice are purportedly subverted by a clandestine, highly organized nexus of corporate operators, municipal financiers, and judicial gatekeepers, the resulting paradigm ceases to be a functional system of law. Instead, it allegedly mutates into a highly sophisticated, parasitic apparatus designed for systemic wealth extraction, structural dispossession, and the absolute subjugation of the unrepresented citizen. 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1

This exhaustive, viral investigative report blows the lid off an allegedly vast, deeply entrenched network operating within Harris County, Texas—a syndicate categorized in detailed dossiers as the “Iron Triangle.” ¹ This insidious network allegedly integrates the immense financial capital of major regional banking institutions, the operational dominance of sprawling multifamily property management firms, and the aggressive, labyrinthine legal maneuvering of specialized law firms. All of this is purportedly shielded by complicit judicial and clerical actors who allegedly manipulate the very dockets they are sworn to protect. 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24

The ensuing forensic analysis meticulously deconstructs the alleged systemic judicial corruption, the exposure of an allegedly sprawling corporate enterprise, and the weaponization of regulatory blockages within the Harris County Civil Courts. ¹ The evidence presented suggests a chilling, dystopian reality: public oversight agencies—including the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, the State Bar of Texas, and local Public Integrity Units—are allegedly operating not as guardians of justice, but as structural protection barriers. ¹ These agencies allegedly effectively insulate institutional corruption, shielding powerful corporate actors from legal accountability while leaving the ordinary citizen trapped in an inescapable web of engineered defeat. 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Tameika Price’s Global Declaration: A Mandate for Her Story, Her Truth

At the absolute epicenter of this unprecedented investigation is Tameika Price, a targeted victim who has stepped forward with a meticulously documented, forensic paper-trail of alleged record tampering, document deletion, and structural fraud. ¹ In an era where media narratives are effortlessly manipulated by coordinated syndicates and digital realities are distorted to protect the powerful, Ms. Price has issued an explicit, viral, and psychologically arresting public mandate. 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1

From Ms. Price, submitted worldwide for her story, her truth:

“This dossier is submitted worldwide to declare my story and my truth, exposing the documented reality of what these networks do. Let me be absolutely clear: I am not suicidal, I am not a criminal, and I have no mental health issues. Remember, while the media can fabricate any narrative using paid actors and coordinated testimonials, this story is entirely verified by hard, indisputable facts. We must not remain silent. Silence only guarantees that you will always be a victim to a coordinated network of corporate and legal actors that acts as if they are gods. It is time to stop allowing powerful syndicates to abuse everyday people for monetary gain and corporate leverage. They protect their friends and family yet penalize you the moment you step up to protect yourself and your family. They are not our gods. If it was written that a higher power saved humanity from historical slavery, who is intervening to save us now? We are trapped in a system of modern mental slavery—enslaved behind a currency of their own creation, fueled by manufactured wars, theft, and institutional corruption. They have created a system where they dictate who is right and who is wrong, even while they are the ones committing the offenses. Who is here to protect us? Where are the attorneys for the innocent? We see these corrupt networks easily secure million-dollar legal teams to represent them that facilitate paid crimes and operate like paid actors. Yet, if an ordinary citizen is victimized, they cannot find a soul to stand up for them without demanding $500 an hour. Someone must intervene. We must act now. Gratitude to all who stand with me. Wake up and stop allowing these stories to go viral for gossip without justice.” ¹

This profound, undeniable plea strikes at the very core of our collective complacency. This dynamic is framed not merely as a legal dispute, but as a continuation of historical subjugation—an ongoing system of “mental slavery.” Ms. Price demands that the public stop staying silent, warning that remaining passive merely guarantees that you will always be prey to these specific institutional actors who falsely operate as if they are untouchable. 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24

The Bottom Line: A Summary for the General Public [548 491 698 719]

If you are not familiar with complex legal or professional jargon, here is exactly what is happening in simple terms:

This report claims that a powerful group consisting of a major local bank, a massive apartment property management company, and a specialized law firm are allegedly working together to cheat everyday people out of their money and homes. The bank allegedly holds massive amounts of taxpayer money, the management company runs the apartment buildings, and the law firm allegedly uses unfair, tricky legal maneuvers to automatically win evictions and debt lawsuits.

When a tenant spoke up to demand basic, safe living conditions, the network allegedly retaliated by doing the following:

They allegedly locked her out of her online rent payment portal so they could falsely claim she missed a payment.
They allegedly ignored dangerous conditions, including a fire-retardant leak in the garage that caused the victim to slip and fall, and a 6-month elevator outage that forced the use of 10 flights of stairs.
They allegedly unlawfully towed her vehicle and her visitor’s vehicle under a newly forced, unilateral parking policy.
Frost bank allegedly illegally froze both her personal and business checking accounts (the personal checking account being the same one she used to pay legal e-file fees) to destroy her finances, permanently closing the business account as well to prevent any business operation. They allegedly seized all her money after sending a misdirected demand letter to the wrong address.
When she reported this illegal bank freeze to the Texas Department of Banking, the agency allegedly refused to investigate—despite the fact that freezing a personal account requires a valid court order—because the bank is their untouchable “whale client.” The Texas Department of Banking also allegedly refused to force Frost Bank to provide Ms. Price’s CIF file and records, which she requested 3 times via certified return receipt mail.
The law firm allegedly worked with court clerks to hide her mail, alter dates on paperwork, and forge fake judgments so she would miss her new court dates without knowing it.
When she tried to fight back, specific court reporters (Darlene Stein, Laura Cuthrell, and Lettie Bernice Witter) allegedly stalled, chopped up the record, demanded illegal fees, and produced false transcripts that completely swapped her identity, scrubbed the judge’s actual rulings, and hid evidence that was presented in court. The appellate judges allegedly repeatedly ignored her requests for the original audio to make sure the companies won.
She sent multiple urgent emails directly to the court clerks, the Office of Court Administration, and filed emergency requests for oral hearings to stop the illegal dismissals and the massive property fraud. Yet, she was allegedly completely and systematically ignored, and her legal filings were kept hidden from the system for weeks.
They allegedly tried to plant multiple retaliatory, unserved lawsuits against her, inflating minor debts to a staggering $250,000 each, steered directly into corrupted judicial pipelines.
The agreed take-nothing judgment she won on June 5, 2025, signed by all attorneys ¹, was actually an allegedly orchestrated “trick” to vacate her JP victory and re-route her case directly into Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas’s court—where Attorney Ayinde Ashford’s cases are routinely funneled to secure automatic corporate wins regardless of the facts.¹
When she petitioned the Supreme Court of Texas (Case No. 25-1058), she detailed how Appellate Justices Amparo “Amy” Guerra and David Gunn allegedly aided and protected this fraud by denying her motions to compel the raw audio records due to major errors and fraud that cant fall up under a jurisdiction of a work product and its discriminatory to provide it to represented parties versus unrepresented parties. She also exposed how Justice Guerra allegedly procedurally violated mandatory rules by completely refusing to refer her Verified Motion to Recuse to the Administrative Judge, choosing instead to handle it herself and issue a self-serving denial.

The victim has documented all of this and is demanding a full investigation into over 200 similar cases involving these specific attorneys and judges. However, the agencies meant to police bad judges and lawyers are allegedly ignoring the proof to protect these powerful companies. This article is a warning and a call to action for the public to wake up, look at the actual facts, and demand real justice before more innocent people are targeted by this system.

Please text your email addresses or phone numbers to what’s app 512-645-9519 to be added for updates regarding her situation and justice and or to send her referrals for justice action.

918 775 698 1818 • 719 31 • 8888 • 710 42

What this report reveals is a closed-loop system of corruption where the financial

institutions responsible for holding public tax dollars are the same entities actively

engineering the financial ruin of the complainant. This nexus functions as a powerful tool

for corporate retaliation and systemic fraud.

Here is the reason these specific connections that are listed in this article below are

critical to the broader investigative findings:

1. The Creation of a “Closed-Loop” Financial System

The fact that Frost Bank leadership shares governance seats with property management executives creates a direct conflict of interest between public oversight and private profit.

By holding over $21 Million in Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD) public tax deposits, Frost Bank is deeply entrenched in the city’s financial infrastructure.
When senior bank leadership—such as Westchase District Chairman Harry Greenblatt and RPM Senior VP Christopher Cunningham—sit on the same municipal boards as those influencing city tax spending, it effectively aligns public interests with private corporate assets.
This suggests that city tax spending is being leveraged to benefit the very private corporate property assets that the bank is invested in.

2. The Weaponization of Banking for Litigation

“The bank is not a neutral financial actor in this situation, but an active “Enforcer”.

The illegal freezing of the complainant’s accounts by Officer Victor Perdomo is not described as a standard banking error; it is characterized as a tactical maneuver to assist in ongoing litigation.
By seizing the complainant’s funds and closing her accounts, the bank directly intervened to “cover up the illegal activities” associated with the broader corporate network.

3. The Manufacturing of Artificial Default

This explains how the bank creates the pretext for future lawsuits.

The asset freeze was specifically designed to force the complainant into an “artificial default” on her personal and business debts.
This creates a “perfect manufactured pretext” for corporate banks to launch waves of retaliatory lawsuits against the victim.
These lawsuits are then steered directly into the “corrupted court ring” of Judge Jermaine Thomas, as evidenced by creditors filing lawsuits, by credit proxies, inflating a $30,000 debt manufactured by the bank freeze, court injustice and delays into a $250,000 action. These cases were mysteriously steered directly onto the docket of Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas—the very judge who, during a July 22, 2025, eviction trial, actively committed due process violations by suppressing “all” retaliation evidence and denied Mrs. Price a trial.

In summary, this indicates that the bank is using its institutional power to create the very financial distress that its corporate partners then use as legal justification to seize more assets, all while maintaining the appearance of a standard civil or banking dispute.

The Verification Protocol: How You Can Uncover the Facts Yourself

To dismantle the engineered isolation and counter any attempts at media manipulation or the deployment of paid narrative-spinners, it is absolutely imperative that investigative journalists, federal public interest watchdogs, and the general public independently verify the actual facts of each case. ¹ The Harris County judicial system, despite its alleged corruption, maintains digital and physical public repositories where these atrocities can be audited, tracked, and confirmed. 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Do not take our word for it. The public is urgently instructed to utilize the following free portals and methods to locate each case and review the raw, unedited facts that substantiate this report:

Harris County District Clerk (Civil & Family): High-level civil cases, including the Guerra Enterprise real estate fraud (Cause No. 2025-37825 in the 127th District Court) and the retaliatory dismissal lawsuit (Cause No. 202537595 in the 133rd District Court), are managed by the District Clerk. ¹ The physical intake location is 201 Caroline, Suite 110, Houston, Texas 77002. For immediate online verification, navigate to the Harris County District Clerk’s eDocs portal and create a free registered login. ¹ Once authenticated, conduct a “Party Inquiry” or “Case Search”. ¹ This portal allows investigators to track the exact file dates, view universally uploaded documents, and forensically verify the alleged suppression, deletion, and fraudulent reappearance of e-file stamps mentioned by Ms. Price.
Harris County Clerk (County Civil Courts at Law): Cases involving evictions and appeals from Justice of the Peace (JP) courts, as well as unverified, hyper-inflated credit filings initiated by debtors, are managed by the County Clerk’s Civil Department at 201 Caroline, Suite 300. ¹ The online Document Search Portal permits the public to search by specific case number or party name. ¹ Here, investigators can pull the dockets of Judge Jermaine Thomas or Attorney Ayinde Ashford and witness the statistically impossible pipeline of default judgments allegedly engineered against unrepresented pro se litigants starting from December 2024.
Appellate Verification (First Court of Appeals & Supreme Court of Texas): To investigate the alleged administrative stalling, structural retaliation, and audio spoliation by appellate justices and court reporters, a cluster of specific cases must be audited: 01-25-01020-CV, 01-25-00540-CV, 01-25-00602-CV, and 01-25-00852-CV. ¹ These cases can be located via the Texas Judicial Branch website (txcourts.gov) and the state’s central repository, the re:SearchTX platform. Furthermore, mandamus actions such as Case No. 25-1058 can be verified directly through the Supreme Court of Texas case search portals. ¹
Guerra Enterprise Shell Company Fraud Verification: Also look up all the litigation cases with AJ100k Investments, Mark Guerra and STW300k Investments to see all the fraud they have allegedly committed under their shell corps, as Ms. Price has been allegedly refused hearings and default judgments and no one responded and was successfully served.

By aggressively bypassing secondary media interpretations and directly accessing these primary repositories, you can witness the irrefutable forensic paper-trail of alleged record tampering, allegedly forged signatures, and alleged structural fraud firsthand. 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1

The Anatomy of the Iron Triangle

The alleged engine driving this alleged total breakdown of justice and facilitating this systemic mental slavery is an allegedly deeply entrenched, vertically integrated corporate loop operating seamlessly within the City of Houston. ¹ This “Iron Triangle” is not merely a loose collection of coincidental business relationships; it is an allegedly meticulously synchronized, ruthlessly efficient machine that governs the flow of massive capital, the management of real estate assets, and the weaponized enforcement of property rights. ¹ 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24

The Financial Bedrock: Frost Bank and the Monopoly on Municipal Liquidity

To comprehend the sheer, unassailable power of this network, one must first analyze its financial bedrock. Frost Bank (Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.) allegedly operates far beyond the scope of a traditional commercial lender; it has positioned itself as the central treasury partner for the region’s most powerful, life-altering regulatory bodies.

The Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD) determines the taxable value of every single parcel of land and commercial multifamily complex in the county. ¹ Exhaustive forensic research into municipal records indicates that HCAD entrusts a massive portion of its liquidity directly to Frost Bank, with balances exceeding $21,080,210.94.

This creates a staggering, structurally catastrophic alleged conflict of interest. ¹ Frost Bank operates as a primary commercial lender to the multifamily real estate sector. The fundamental valuation of the bank’s collateral is subjected to market forces, but the tax liability—which dictates a borrower’s Net Operating Income (NOI)is controlled exclusively by HCAD. ¹ By functioning as the treasury for the tax assessor while simultaneously financing the very properties being assessed, Frost Bank allegedly occupies a closed-loop ecosystem. ¹ 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Furthermore, Frost Bank proxies and executives sit on the boards of the Westchase District and the East End District. ¹ Phil Green (Chairman & CEO) allegedly directs the bank holding the massive HCAD public tax deposits and oversees the influential Cullen/Frost PAC. Additional executives, such as Kenny Koncaba and Trent Eckel, sit on the boards of the Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership and the Lone Star College Foundation, respectively, while David LePori holds advisory roles at the University of Houston Bauer College of Business. ¹ These strategic appointments place banking executives in direct control of municipal development funds, allowing them to perfectly align city tax spending, infrastructure development, and workforce pipelines with private corporate property assets.

Executives from Frost Bank, such as Oscar Martinez and Yvette Webb, also sit on the board of Crime Stoppers of Houston, an organization heavily involved in judicial politics. ¹ By utilizing this public safety front, the banking and real estate ecosystem can project massive influence over judicial policy, allegedly ensuring a strict judiciary that ruthlessly enforces laws and evictions to protect their collateral assets. ¹

Key Personnel Node	Affiliated Corporate/Legal Entity	Public Sector Connection & Functional Implication
Ayinde I. Ashford	Hoover Slovacek LLP (Associate)	Former City of Houston Prosecutor. Allegedly leverages insider procedural knowledge to manipulate court dockets and coordinate with clerks. ¹
Howard Bookstaff	Hoover Slovacek LLP (Partner)	General Counsel for HAA; Trainer for Harris County JP Courts. Drafts industry leases; influences judicial interpretation of eviction laws. ¹
Harry Greenblatt	Westchase District (Chairman)	Frost Bank Proxy. Directs municipal tax spending to perfectly align with RPM/Frost collateral assets and infrastructure needs. ¹
Jose Valdez	Frost Bank (Executive)	Treasurer, East End District. Controls municipal development funds; directly appointed by the Houston City Council. ¹
Christopher Cunningham	RPM Living (Senior VP)	Board Director, Westchase District. Directs public tax funds to subsidize private corporate security (Westchase Patrol) for RPM properties. ¹

The Operational Nexus: RPM Living and the Public-Private Interlock

If Frost Bank provides the infinite capital, RPM Living allegedly provides the operational, boots-on-the-ground enforcement. ¹ RPM Living is a massive, dominant force in multifamily property management, led by founder Jason Berkowitz and executive owner Josh Kahn, JD. Crucially, Josh Kahn is not only an executive at RPM Living, but his affiliated law firm allegedly provides delinquent tax counsel to government affiliates, and he is allegedly very deeply involved with the City of Houston, establishing another glaring, systemic conflict of interest. ¹ 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1

Furthermore, David A. Northern, Sr. (President & CEO of the Houston Housing Authority) allegedly executed a Memorandum of Understanding granting RPM Living the lucrative management rights to massive tax-exempt assets like the Lakeside Place PFC, effectively removing these properties from public tax rolls. ¹

This is allegedly why you will not find one single lawsuit against RPM Living in Houston, Texas, outside of standard contingent-fee injury cases, even though their online reviews are consistently horrific, detailing widespread complaints of property mismanagement. ¹ The structural immunity they allegedly possess effectively shields them from standard consumer litigation. ¹ This involves the RPM Living / West Gray Street Owner LLC partner that owns the apartments named Dolce Midtown and now Midtown 180, which is where the retaliation allegedly occurred connected to the Cause No. 2025-37825 lawsuit. Ms. Price emphasized, “People are put in certain positions to allow injustice is wrong.” This systemic protection allegedly started with this City of Houston attorney and Hoover Slovacek. Because of this, the public will allegedly only see successful injury cases against them, which most likely involve a contingent attorney. Standing against this network, Ms. Price made her position clear: “This is why I put in for a transfer for my cases into another City because of this triangle.”

The intersection of RPM Living and Frost Bank is allegedly glaringly visible within the governance of the Westchase District, a municipal management district funded by mandatory assessments on commercial property owners. Within this specific “situation room,” Frost Bank proxy Harry Greenblatt and RPM Living Senior Vice President Christopher Cunningham share contiguous seats on the Board of Directors. ¹ Additionally, Stacy Hunt (Greystar Executive Director) allegedly serves on both the HAA Board and the Westchase District Board, further tightening this circle of elite property managers who coordinate with the banking sector.

As board members, these executives allegedly direct municipal tax assessments toward initiatives that directly benefit their corporate bottom lines, such as allocating funds to the Westchase District Patrol, a private security force that actively patrols the very apartment complexes managed by RPM Living. ¹ This allegedly effectively subsidizes RPM’s private corporate security costs with public district tax revenue. ¹ 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

The Legal Enforcer: Hoover Slovacek LLP and the Weaponization of Procedure

For this ecosystem to extract wealth efficiently, it requires a ruthless, unyielding mechanism to enforce contracts, evict struggling tenants, and execute rapid foreclosures. ¹ Hoover Slovacek LLP allegedly acts as the legal enforcer and the “Shield and Sword” for this entire syndicate. ¹

Partner Howard Bookstaff serves as the General Counsel for the Houston Apartment Association (HAA). ¹ In this supreme capacity, Bookstaff allegedly acts as a judicial educator and legislative architect; he drafts the industry-standard “Redbook” leases used by RPM Living, while directly conducting training seminars for the local Justice of the Peace (JP) judges who rule on his firm’s eviction dockets. ¹ When Bookstaff or his associates appear in court, they are often arguing cases before adjudicators they have personally educated and influenced. ¹

Partners Edward L. Rothberg and Deidre Carey Brown allegedly manage complex bankruptcy proceedings involving the Harris County Tax Office to protect the assets of lender/landlord clients. ¹ Furthermore, Murray Lobb and Charles (Chuck) E. Lobb, Jr. allegedly serve as specialized foreclosure counsel for Frost Bank, coordinating rapid real estate liquidations. ¹ Hoover Slovacek does not just play by the rules; they allegedly help write them. Correspondence reveals their attorneys allegedly lobbied the Supreme Court of Texas Advisory Committee regarding Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 646-653 (which govern executions and constable sales), ensuring the foreclosure process remains efficient for their clients. ¹ 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Simultaneously, Associate Ayinde I. Ashford, a former City of Houston Prosecutor, allegedly utilizes his deep insider status and intimate knowledge of municipal court procedures to manipulate court repositories and clear the docket of any adverse rulings. ¹ The ground game for these high-volume JP court evictions is often executed by associates like Alex Barclay, putting Bookstaff’s strategies into ruthless action. ¹ The symbiotic nature of this triangle is elegantly corrupt: Frost Bank finances the properties, RPM Living manages the assets, and Hoover Slovacek litigates the evictions.

The Judicial Feedback Loop: Patronage, Protection, and Pay-to-Play

The structural integrity of this immense financial machine relies entirely on the local judiciary to unconditionally enforce contracts, process evictions with ruthless speed, and shield corporate actors from any tenant liability. ¹ A consistent, heavy stream of campaign contributions allegedly flows from the Cullen/Frost Bankers PAC, Hoover Slovacek attorneys, and RPM-affiliated individuals directly into the coffers of the Harris County judiciary. ¹

This financial patronage allegedly guarantees a “business-friendly” bench, maintaining an environment entirely conducive to the rapid enforcement of creditor rights and the crushing of pro se litigants. ¹ Campaign finance records indicate a fascinating anomaly: RPM Living employee Tony Sousa allegedly utilized Frost Bank to process political expenditures categorized specifically as “Merchant Banking Fees.” This demonstrates an operational intimacy where the bank actively facilitates and finances the management company’s political donations. ¹ 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1

Engineered Isolation: The Systemic Blocking of Legal Counsel

A critical, terrifying component of this syndicate’s success is its alleged ability to utterly isolate its victims. ¹ The “Iron Triangle” corporate network has actively, intentionally, and systematically allegedly blocked targeted victims like Tameika Price from receiving proper legal representation.

Because the opposing attorneys at Hoover Slovacek hold immense political power, local law firms repeatedly and uniformly decline to accept cases against them. ¹ This engineered isolation leaves unrepresented consumers entirely vulnerable to complex, intentionally obscured procedural traps inside the courtroom, perfectly fulfilling Ms. Price’s assertion that the system is designed to penalize those without “power bridges” who merely wish to protect their families.

In a direct effort to bypass this engineered isolation, Ms. Price has actively escalated her claims to seek representation from complex litigation attorneys specializing in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). On May 19, 2026, Ms. Price issued a formal evidentiary dossier which included videos to a Complex RICO Litigation Attorneys, seeking to bring federal civil rights, RICO, and massive tort claims against Hoover Slovacek LLP, RPM Living, and Frost Bank. ¹ The letter explicitly outlines the “five-step, repeatable systemic fraud operation” allegedly designed to tamper with governmental records to guarantee automatic corporate wins and shield these actors from liability. 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

The Modus Operandi: A Forensic Deconstruction of the Five-Step Fraud Assembly Line

The absolute core of the criminal complaint currently pending before the Harris County District Attorney’s Office (Public Integrity Division) details a highly sophisticated, multi-layered clerical and legal racket. ¹ This alleged racket guarantees automatic corporate wins through a repeatable, five-step fraudulent assembly line:

The JP Court Appeal Abuse: Attorneys allegedly allow adverse judgments to be entered against their corporate clients in JP courts, or purposefully skip trial dates entirely, simply to set up an automatic appeal to the County Court level. ¹ In Ms. Price’s specific eviction case, the attorneys formally agreed to a take-nothing judgment on June 5, 2025, which was signed by Tameika Price, Briana Cains (counsel for Plaintiff), and Ayinde Ashford.¹ Unbeknownst to Ms. Price, this agreed take-nothing judgment was allegedly a calculated trick to get her into the County Court system.¹ While her case was originally assigned to a different judge in the County Civil Court at Law, it was mysteriously routed and reassigned directly to the docket of Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas, where, as a standard pattern, most of Attorney Ayinde Ashford’s cases are allegedly routed to guarantee automatic, predetermined wins regardless of the facts.¹
The Clerical Appeal Disguise and Transcript Tampering: To effectively mask the glaring illegality of appealing a case that his client either settled or outright lost, the network allegedly utilizes compromised County Clerks to fraudulently alter public records. ¹ On July 1, 2025, a hand-typed, completely falsified default judgment was allegedly stamped and seamlessly slipped into the official court file. ¹ To further obscure the paper trail, the appellant’s name is allegedly purposely left blank on public digital records, and clerks have allegedly been caught inserting fake “Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs” forms under the names of unrepresented defendants to facilitate these corporate appeals at no cost to the plaintiffs. ¹
Coordinated Notice Obstruction and Mail Wiping: To guarantee the targeted victim never appears in the new County Court to defend themselves, court staff allegedly execute systemic mail and digital e-file obstruction. ¹ Physical envelopes containing legal citations are allegedly intentionally wiped, cut off, or physically obscured of the addressee’s personal name and physical address to construct a false “Undeliverable” stamp justification.
The Manufactured Default Judgment: Kept completely blind to the existence of the appeal, the defendant naturally fails to appear. The wholly falsified July 1st default judgment allegedly bears a forged signature of JP Judge Steve Duble. ¹
Corporate Dispossession and Wealth Extraction: Armed constables are allegedly dispatched to execute sudden, aggressive evictions against individuals who had already won their underlying cases, creating a highly lucrative pipeline of manufactured back-rent judgments. 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

The Retaliation Campaign: Artificial Defaults and Hyper-Inflated Phantom Dockets

The full, crushing weight of this syndicate was allegedly brought to bear against Tameika Price when she dared to demand legally mandated habitability repairs from her RPM Living managed property. ¹ The documented hazards she reported were severe: she endured six months of prolonged elevator malfunctions requiring her to carry groceries up ten flights of stairs and restricting access for her disabled parent ¹; she suffered through the unreliable GateWise access system which left residents stranded ¹; and she reported persistent water leaks and the shedding of a hazardous, white fire-retardant substance in the parking garage. ¹ On May 29, 2025, Ms. Price suffered a slip and fall injury directly resulting from these allegedly ignored hazards in the parking garage.

In a shocking act of institutional protection, the City of Houston allegedly filed a falsified report asserting there were “no visible damages” regarding the white, powdery residue and severe garage leaks. This official claim directly contradicts the physical reality of the property, where the entire apartment complex could testify to the heavy white substance covering vehicles daily for nearly two years, a fact corroborated by videos and multiple public online reviews posted long before Ms. Price filed her formal complaint. ¹ 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1

Additionally, Defendants allegedly unilaterally imposed a new “Parking Addendum” virtual permit system on April 1, 2025, utilizing immediate towing threats without legal notice. ¹ In a stark act of retribution after she rejected this addendum, the network allegedly unlawfully towed her vehicle on June 8, 2025, and a visitor’s vehicle on July 4, 2025.

RPM Manager Christopher Cisneros allegedly blocked her digital payment portal on May 6, 2025, to purposefully manufacture an artificial rent delinquency while she was negotiating her contract with RPM Regional Manager. ¹ Tameika Price had 2 years of perfect payment history when they allegedly blocked her digital payment portal and gave her an eviction notice on the same day. ¹ This occurred immediately after she attempted to negotiate a resolution for the Plaintiff’s ongoing breaches, which included Ms. Price rejecting a penalty-free cancellation on April 18, 2025, and instead countering with a formal demand for a rent waiver and a security deposit return.

Reflecting on this sequence of events, Ms. Price stated: “This is how some oppression works, they build a wall of actors in the system to do anything to get a win and even those actors even commit crimes to get the win and to never give you justice. In the beginning, all I did was ask them to pay for my moving expenses since I had all the evidence of the retaliation that the manager had committed against me. They agreed to cancel my contract after reviewing the evidence, but then during negotiation time, I was blocked from paying rent, then they tried to evict me. This has been reported to every justice program that exists, including the District Attorney and the Public Integrity Division. I moved to Houston because I saw unity here and African Americans striving as entrepreneurs, but I have never been in so many legal affairs after someone did me wrong. They attacked my finances, froze my bank accounts illegally, refused to sign my court judgments against known scammers and contempt, produced false transcripts, and denied me an attorney through the committee. These agencies that are supposed to be for the consumers are gatekeeping. Is it really about justice, power or discrimination, like what is this?” 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

When she stepped forward to expose this, the retaliation escalated. Once Ms. Price reported these actors to the State Bar of Texas, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct (SCJC), and the Public Integrity Division in August 2025, the retaliation allegedly became exponentially worse. Ms. Price also reported these ongoing abuses directly to the court system, and it became worse and she was strictly ignored. ¹ The network allegedly cut off multiple streams of her income.

This pattern of administrative stonewalling and direct record suppression is backed by a verifiable, forensic paper trail of ignored communications. On July 6, 2025, and July 7, 2025, Ms. Price sent urgent, formal emails directly to the Office of Court Administration (legal@txcourts.gov, info@txcourts.gov) and Lead District Court Clerk Ashley Lopez, pleading for an administrative review, investigation, and correction of the erroneous dismissal and the systemic filing delays. ¹ Despite documenting that her legal filings were disappearing from the court system for weeks at a time, and that her fundamental constitutional rights were being actively violated under color of law, these formal complaints and desperate calls for court intervention were allegedly completely ignored.

In direct coordination with the ongoing litigation, Frost Bank Officer Victor Perdomo allegedly illegally froze the complainant’s bank accounts, seized her operational funds, and permanently closed both her personal and business checking accounts in a bid to cover up the illicit activities. ¹ Her accounts, including both her personal and business accounts, were allegedly illegally frozen and permanently closed by Frost Bank, causing her to default on both personal and business debts. At Frost Bank, she had 3 years of perfect payment history before this illegal account freeze. ¹ The victim reported being so distraught by this engineered financial ruin that she could not physically or mentally move for days.

Furthermore, Frost Bank allegedly sent a demand letter for a minor payment to the completely wrong address. When the victim naturally failed to pay this misdirected notice of $945.00, the bank allegedly seized all the money from a personal checking account that she had maintained for years prior to opening her business account, subsequently closing the business account as well. ¹ Crucially, the exact same Frost account that the victim utilized to successfully e-file her legal documents was the very account that was allegedly illegally frozen and permanently closed. ¹ 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Compounding this severe overreach, another corporation affiliated with the courts allegedly refused to provide necessary documents, and the Texas Department of Banking (Record No. 2026-0546) and Director Wendy Rodriguez allegedly completely refused to investigate Frost Bank’s illegal freeze. ¹ Standard, fundamental legal protocols dictate that an extreme measure such as freezing a personal account can only be lawfully executed with a valid court order. However, the regulatory agency allegedly refused to investigate and ignored documented proof that the demand letter was deliberately delivered to an incorrect address, the amount of the seized funds was not the amount on the demand letter, and that Frost Bank had seized all funds in the personal account without a valid court order. ¹ The agency purportedly allowed this because Frost Bank operates as their untouchable “whale client,” proving that even state-level oversight agencies act as administrative shields for massive financial institutions rather than protecting the public. ¹

Furthermore, Frost Bank refused to give Ms. Price her own records, which constituted her second complaint. Again, the TDB and Director Wendy Rodriguez wouldn’t make the bank give her the records she requested, but instead accepted Frost Bank sending standard bank statements, which is not what she requested at all. The Texas Finance Commission has received these complaints as well.

They then allegedly tried to plant retaliatory phantom dockets into the public registry, inflating minor debts into astronomical $250,000 claims. ¹ To be legally precise, the targeted victim has not been formally or legally served with any such actions, and these public registry discoveries do not constitute a general appearance, waiver of service, or public acknowledgment of any valid lawsuit. However, public court dockets indicate the existence of an allegedly retaliatory, unserved filing purportedly initiated by proxies regarding credit debts directly manufactured by Frost Bank’s illegal account freeze, due process violations, fraud, and retaliation from the courts that are in this triangle. Surprisingly, this exact unverified case was mysteriously assigned directly to the docket of Judge Jermaine Thomas.

Again, Ms. Price has not been legally served with any lawsuit, and identifying this public docket entry does not constitute an acknowledgment of any valid claim. These unserved, phantom actions are allegedly being steered directly into corrupted judicial channels to entirely destroy Ms. Price financially before she is even formally notified to mount a defense. ¹ 548 49 1698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1

Judicial Complicity: Suppressing Evidence, Deleting Data, and Engineered Perjury

Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas allegedly acts as the primary judicial “protection zone” for this operation. During the July 22, 2025, trial, Judge Thomas allegedly actively facilitated due process violations by intentionally suppressing verifiable, exculpatory evidence, categorically excluding certified digital logs from the RealPage ClickPay system which definitively proved the property manager blocked the payment portal out of retaliation.

Judge Thomas allegedly actively ignored that the Notice to Vacate had no amount due and no payment instructions, rendering it an invalid notice to vacate letter. Furthermore, Judge Thomas ignored that the opposing attorney only produced 6 pages of the 39-page lease. The full lease, which included explicit instructions to pay through the very payment portal they blocked, was requested during discovery and was never provided. Moreover, Tameika Price filed an additional formal counterclaim lawsuit for retaliation because her requests for a trial by jury were ignored, and they forced her to have a trial by judge. The court completely ignored the counterclaim, but she has submitted the paid receipts to several agencies and advocates. ¹ 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24

The depth of this courtroom manipulation is staggering. RPM Manager Christopher Cisneros allegedly committed blatant perjury on the stand, swearing the payment portal was blocked on May 21st with no presented evidence. However, the suppressed ClickPay logs (the payment portal) and videos definitively prove the block occurred precisely on May 6, 2025, at 10:32 . To further dismantle this perjury, the record contains a Sworn Statement confirming Constable Bryan Rice attempted to serve the eviction on May 14 and May 15, and an email from JP Clerk Melissa Dees to Appellee’s counsel confirming the e-filed eviction on May 13. ¹ It is factually impossible for management to lack notice until May 21st when a Constable was physically attempting service a week prior. ¹

To ensure Ms. Price could not properly defend herself against this perjury, Judge Jermaine Thomas and Appellee’s counsel allegedly engineered a “Friday Night Trap,” delivering evasive discovery at 11:24 PM on Friday, July 18, exactly one business day before the trial by judge providing no information. ¹ Judge Thomas further compounded these violations by allegedly denying Ms. Price’s constitutionally protected right to a jury trial, ignoring her retaliation claims, and validating a trial setting on July 7, 2025, despite the fact that the appeal was not legally perfected until the opposing attorneys filed the appeal on the take nothing judgment and the cash bond being transferred on July 9, 2025, at 8:11 AM. This “Perfection Gap” rendered the trial court proceedings a jurisdictional nullity.

The corruption allegedly extends deep into the Civil District Courts. Judge Nicole Perdue is allegedly heavily implicated in a severe pattern of unauthorized ex parte order modifications and direct, blatant data tampering. This case was allegedly dismissed without a hearing on June 20th, 4 days after a TRO hearing and after the defendants had illegally towed her vehicle. The same case was re-activated after Ms. Price sent in a complaint letter to the courts, but then it was dismissed again on July 15, 2025, with no hearing and under false claims. ¹ Ms. Price’s legally submitted, e-filed documents allegedly completely disappeared from the public record system for two consecutive weeks. She even received an official, deeply incriminating e-file rejection message ordering her to: “Remove the file date stamp of June 24, 2025.” ¹

Further exposing Marilyn Burgess’s administration, this reveals an alleged deliberate, multi-month administrative hold scheme. An executed citation demonstrates it was successfully served on June 4th/10th, and her June 16th amended petition went missing and wasn’t served until July 21, 2025, but the 133rd Court allegedly held the document and intentionally refused to file it into the public record until October 17, 2025, delaying the legal process by months. 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Collateral Damage: The Guerra Enterprise Network and the Refusal to Rule

The Harris County court system’s total, inexplicable refusal to rule on the complainant’s separate, overwhelming real estate fraud case against the Guerra Enterprise Network (before Judge Denise Brown in the 127th District Court) is cited by Ms. Price as direct, coordinated retaliation.

Operating through an intricate web of shell companies—including STW300K Investments LLC, AJ100K Investments LLC, Cash Flow King LLC, Blingtastic Investments LLC, Five Million Investments, ML 100K Investments, and allegedly, Smak Realestate LLC—Javier Marko Guerra has allegedly scammed low-income and elderly consumers for over a decade. ¹ Javier Marko Guerra(Mark Guerra) is specifically accused of allegedly misusing real estate licenses and even impersonating his own son to completely evade mandatory statutory disclosures. ¹ The inner workings of this corporate network reveal a highly coordinated loop involving Attorney Eric Days (Managing Partner at Guerra Days Law Group), Mark Lambo Guerra (whose broker license was allegedly misused), Travis Pryor (All Day Realty), Christian Sanchez (REI Servicing Company), Valerie Janz and Jennifer Perez (facilitators of deceptive closings), Patricia R. Fritsch (operational assistant handling commingled funds), and Robyn Jones (House of Chavez LLC broker). ¹ Ms. Price’s notes also reveal that they are linked with a lot of attorneys for protections, establishing a barrier against accountability.

Following the filing of the lawsuit against them, controlling members Angel Javier Guerra (the father) allegedly executed 77 separate, blatantly fraudulent property transfers. Despite clear, documented proof, Judge Denise Brown explicitly allegedly refused to sign mandatory default judgments against defendants who completely failed to answer the lawsuit. ¹ As detailed in official court logs, from July 2, 2025, to February 13, 2026, the Plaintiff filed multiple procedurally perfect motions—including Motions for Judgment Nihil Dicit, Sanctions, Default Judgments, Motion to Disqualify counsel due to conflict of interest findings and Emergency Motions to Prohibit Fraudulent Conveyances—that were allegedly met with total judicial inaction or unconstitutional summary rejections by Judge Brown without a single oral hearing. These hearings were requested and were ignored. ¹ 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

The complete, defiant refusal of the court system to address these grievances is also documented in active court records. The Plaintiff submitted an emergency Transmittal Letter directly to the 127th Judicial District Court Coordinator on January 26, 2026, detailing high-velocity “insider” property foreclosures (such as 6627 Villarreal Dr. and 1110 Lafferty Rd.) designed to actively dissipate assets and avoid ethical oversight. This included documenting an incurable conflict of interest where Attorney Eric Days personally sold land to his client. ¹ She subsequently filed an Emergency Request for Oral Hearing on February 13, 2026, regarding these urgent matters. ¹ Yet, these urgent transmittal letters, emails to the court coordinator and master clerk, and formal hearing requests were allegedly completely ignored by the court coordinator, master clerk Carol Wiliams and Judge Denise Brown, with the court allegedly completely refusing to schedule a single hearing, allow her to argue her case on the merits, or sign default judgments against successfully served defendants who refused to answer.

Appellate Stalling, Audio Spoliation, and the Scrubbing of the Historic Record

When victims attempt to escape this localized corruption and escalate these abuses to higher courts, they are allegedly met with aggressive administrative stalling. Official court reporters Darlene Stein and Laura Cuthrell have allegedly produced completely falsified, unverified, and heavily fragmented false transcripts.

The gravity of these actions regarding the fabrication and destruction of court records, if proven, could allegedly constitute a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 1506, which prohibits the theft, alteration, or falsification of records in a United States court, and carries a penalty of up to five years in prison. ¹

The evidence of this audio spoliation and the generation of these allegedly false transcripts is stark across specific appellate cases, compounded by the actions of additional unauthorized reporters:

Darlene Stein (Cause No. 01-25-00540-CV): In this Direct Appeal, court reporter Darlene Stein allegedly produced a completely falsified and unverified Reporter’s Record. ¹ The transcript allegedly contains glaring, intentional errors designed to sabotage the pro se victim. In the “APPEARANCES” section, Stein allegedly assigned the phone number for Sovany Law Firm to Ms. Price, falsely listed opposing counsel Ayinde Ashford as the “Attorney for Plaintiff,” and absurdly misidentified female Master Clerk Ashley Lopez as a male attorney named “Mr. Ashley” to mask clerical interference. ¹ Furthermore, Stein allegedly fabricated dialogue on pages 14 and 15 to make it appear the hearing concerned an eviction rather than a Temporary Restraining Order for harassment, and she allegedly completely scrubbed the verbal judicial ruling from the record. ¹ Darlene Stein also allegedly made it seem like Ms. Price was trying to get her case heard in their court when her case was already pending and the defendants RPM Living had been successfully served. Also, the court reporters allegedly omitted several pieces of Ms. Price’s evidence from the transcripts. The reporter’s index allegedly falsely claims Defendant’s Exhibit 1 was “(Not tendered),” directly contradicting transcript page 43 where Judge Thomas explicitly stated, “It’s admitted… Defendant’s Exhibit 1”. ¹ Despite Ms. Price’s approved indigency status, Stein discriminatorily allegedly demanded fees to release the record. ¹ Despite certifying the proceedings were captured by a “computerized stenotype machine,” she has allegedly continuously withheld the audio recordings by falsely claiming “there is no audio,” while appellate justices have allegedly repeatedly denied motions to compel. ¹ 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024
Laura Cuthrell (Cause No. 01-25-00602-CV): In this Appeal, court reporter Laura Cuthrell allegedly produced a false, deeply fragmented transcript. Cuthrell allegedly intentionally omitted Ms. Price’s previous retaliation complaints, housing discrimination complaints, ClickPay records (payment portal for RealPage), and her City of Houston complaints from the official record. Furthermore, Cuthrell allegedly fabricated a judicial remark claiming the court called the discovery a ‘fishing expedition.’ This fabrication was allegedly demonstrably false because there was no active district case in court at the time, which is exactly why the related 01-25-00540-CV case exists in the court of appeals. To hide this structural dialogue fragmentation, Cuthrell has allegedly suppressed the machine-recorded source audio for over 280 days and counting. ¹ Just as in the previous case, the appellate justices have allegedly repeatedly denied motions to compel the release of the audio record, effectively acting as a shield for the lower courts. ¹
Lettie Bernice Witter (CSR-6772): To further the systemic obstruction, unauthorized court reporter Lettie Bernice Witter allegedly stalled for seven weeks before filing a false “Information Sheet” in the Court of Appeals asserting there was “No Reporter’s Record,” directly and irreparably prejudicing Ms. Price’s constitutional right to appeal. ¹

This fragmentation and suppression are specifically designed to scrub liability from the historic record. The network allegedly relied on blatant perjury and refused to give Ms. Price the audio because they knew the truth would be undeniably exposed. ¹ Furthermore, reliable reports indicate that since formal public integrity reporting began on August 9, 2025, court staff have allegedly begun actively deleting signed appeal judgments from the system in an effort to scrub the digital audit trail before federal intervention.

To combat this severe record suppression, the Authorized Representative issued formal “Supplemental Administrative Mandates” to the Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC) against the court reporters. These mandates demand the maximum penalty of certification revocation and a penalty for the withheld audio. Notably, declaring that non-compliance is a breach of the Verbatim Standard requiring immediate administrative rectification. 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Furthermore, Ms. Price alleges blatant discrimination regarding them not providing the transcripts, asserting that the JBCC and the courts are trying to protect these actors. In response to an administrative dismissal, she issued the following formal mandate directly to the JBCC:

TO: Megan LaVoie, Administrative Director, Office of Court Administration (OCA) megan.lavoie@txcourts.gov

CC: Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas Blake.Hawthorne@txcourts.gov; Complaints Division, JBCC compliancedepartment@txcourts.gov

FROM: Tameika Price, Authorized Representative

DATE: June 26, 2026

RE: FORMAL GRIEVANCE AGAINST AMY SMITH (JBCC COMPLIANCE DIVISION) FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MALFEASANCE, DECEPTION, AND OBSTRUCTION

I, Tameika Price, file this formal grievance against Amy Smith, Judicial Regulatory Assistant for the JBCC, for administrative malfeasance, intentional obstruction of justice, and the active shielding of criminal conduct in JBCC Cause Nos. 0926 and 0927.

Calculated Deception Regarding Case Status: On May 12, 2026, I communicated with Amy Smith regarding the status of my complaint. She provided a timeline for an August resolution while she and the JBCC Director secretly issued an Administrative Dismissal on May 21, 2026. This was a calculated act of deception designed to manipulate me into missing my 30-day window for reconsideration.
Deliberate Obstruction of Evidentiary Record: Amy Smith has intentionally ignored, suppressed, and refused to present my supplemental filings to the Commission for over a year. She deliberately ignored evidence of transcript tampering, fabricated judicial dialogue, and identity fraud, choosing to classify felony-level transcript tampering as a mere “dispute over work product” to protect licensees.
Regulatory Malfeasance & Discriminatory Misdirection: Amy Smith’s repeated claims that the JBCC “does not interfere in court matters” are deliberate misdirection. I am not asking the JBCC to intervene in my civil lawsuit; I am demanding that they perform their exclusive statutory duty to discipline their own licensees for fraud, perjury, and professional incompetence under Tex. Gov’t Code § 154.110.
Bad-Faith Handling of Indigent Filings: Amy Smith’s division has facilitated a regulatory environment where indigent Pro Se litigants are denied the basic audio-verification tools routinely afforded to represented parties. Her role has been to obstruct, deflect, and delay rather than to provide impartial oversight mandated by the JBCC Code of Ethics.

I demand an immediate internal investigation, the removal of Amy Smith from oversight of my cases to ensure the impartiality of the August 7, 2026, hearing, and an audit of the JBCC’s failure to regulate Stein and Cutherell.

/s/ Tameika Price, Authorized Representative

Meanwhile, the structural stalling allegedly continues unabated. Also, in the direct appeal case 01-25-00540-CV, the appellate court has yet to make a decision, and it has been sitting there for 6 months while they allegedly continue to plot. “But justice is mine,” says Tameika Price, “and this has to stop.” ¹ 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

This systemic pattern of institutional and discriminatory treatment is further exposed in the Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed in the Supreme Court of Texas (Case No. 25-1058).¹ The petition forensically details how Appellate Justices Amparo “Amy” Guerra and David Gunn have allegedly actively aided and protected these fraudulent actions by repeatedly denying the Relator’s motions to compel the raw machine-recorded source audio.¹ Furthermore, Justice Guerra allegedly committed a severe procedural violation of TRCP 18b and TRAP 16.3(b) by completely refusing to refer the Relator’s Verified Motion to Recuse to the Administrative Judge of the Judicial District for independent assignment.¹ Instead of sending the recusal to the administrative judge, she allegedly kept the motion and routed it only to her own en banc court for an immediate administrative denial, shielding her misconduct from independent scrutiny.

Part IV: The Judicial Transmogrification

The Case Roster: 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24

Cause No. 202537825 (127th District): Tameika Price against Mark Guerra(STW300k Investments and AJ100k investments)
Cause No. 202537595 (133rd District) Tameika Price against RPM Living & West Street Gray Owner – Currently under Appeal for Erroneous Dismissal
Appeals Tameika filed (First Court of Appeals): 01-25-0120-CV, 01-25-00540-CV, 01-25-00602-CV, and 01-25-00852-CV.
Disciplinary Complaints (Target Reporters for alleged fraud):

JBCC 0926: Complaint against Darlene Stein.
JBCC 0927: Complaint against Laura Cutherell.
JBCC 6772: Complaint against Lettie Witter.
TREC Case No. 252573: Tameika filed this case on the alleged scammers’ licenses. Jennifer Hall is the investigator, and the attorney is Cary Bruner on this Complaint against realtors Mark Lamborghini Guerra(Real Estate License #800616), Travis Pryor(Real Estate License #606581), and Robyn Jones (Real Estate License #570708), Valerie Janz (Real Estate License #616120); Jennifer Perez (Real Estate License #616120). They have stalled this case for over a year and put all the blame on the African American broker Travis Pryor.

Ms. Price had to write the attorney the following email:

Complaint No. 252573 – Formal Rebuttal to Jurisdictional Determinations & Notice of Discriminatory Practices

Dear Mr. Bruner,

Thank you for your response. While I appreciate your clarification on the administrative process and the upcoming State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) timeline for Travis Pryor, I must formally register my strong objection to your legal interpretations and the highly unequal, discriminatory manner in which your division is prosecuting the respondents in this case.

Please accept this correspondence as my formal rebuttal and demand for comprehensive enforcement action against all licensed and unlicensed parties.

1. Notice of Systemic Racial Bias and Selective Prosecution

I must formally call out the glaring double standard in how your division is handling this complaint. It has not escaped my notice that as an African American female consumer who was defrauded, my complaint languished for over a year, and my severe financial injury is now being administratively minimized.

Furthermore, Travis Pryor—the only African American agent involved—is the only respondent being aggressively prosecuted and pushed to a formal trial at SOAH. Meanwhile, the white and Hispanic respondents who architected this fraud are being systematically protected. Your attempt to drop active license holders from the case using highly questionable jurisdictional loopholes, while focusing all disciplinary weight on the sole Black agent, represents a biased and unequal application of TREC’s regulatory authority. I will not accept an enforcement outcome that selectively targets one minority individual while shielding the rest of a documented, multi-layered syndicate.

I must remind you that under 22 Texas Administrative Code § 535.141, the Commission is statutorily mandated to prioritize complaint investigations using a risk-based approach. Currently, TREC’s Standards and Enforcement Services (SES) division utilizes a strict three-level prioritization system.

My complaint does not just touch upon a single priority area; it triggers almost every major category of Level 1 Misconduct, the highest and most severe tier of regulatory violations regulated by your agency. Specifically, this transaction involves:

Fraud or misrepresentation involving a financial loss.
Unlicensed real estate brokerage activity (by Javier Marko Guerra, who fraudulently utilized active licenses to execute agreements).
Mortgage fraud (perpetrated by the unlicensed entities operating out of the deceptive closing room).

Furthermore, TREC rules explicitly state that if a complaint involves three or more groups of license holders, the priority level must be raised. This case involves a multi-layered syndicate of multiple brokers, sponsored agents, and unlicensed actors working in concert.

Given that this case represents a textbook, high-priority Level 1 investigation, it is procedurally and legally absurd for your office to concentrate its entire prosecutorial weight solely on Travis Pryor. Minimizing the severe Level 1 violations of the white and Hispanic respondents while aggressively pushing only the Black agent to a formal SOAH trial represents a complete departure from TREC’s risk-based enforcement mandates. I demand that all parties associated with these Level 1 violations be prosecuted with equal and maximum administrative severity.

2. Mark L. Guerra: Substantive Fraud vs. Procedural Penalties

Your email notes that Mark L. Guerra remains suspended for “failing to provide requested information.” Penalizing him merely for failing to respond is unacceptable. He allowed his active real estate license to be utilized in a coordinated fraud scheme. I expect TREC to pursue substantive disciplinary charges against his license for gross negligence, untrustworthiness, and complicity in this scheme, rather than sweeping his involvement under the rug with a procedural penalty simply because he refused to answer your letters.

3. Demand for a Comprehensive Audit of Travis Pryor’s Transactional and Compensation Records

Given that Travis Pryor requested a SOAH hearing, I formally demand that TREC conduct a comprehensive evaluation and audit of all of his transactional files and compensation records under TREC Rule §535.2(h).

My records show that Travis Pryor has been actively executing real estate deals and transactions with the Guerra family for over 10 years. He also admitted that relationship in the evidence that was provided to your agency. A full audit of his compensation agreements, receipts, bank ledgers, and communication logs over this decade-long period is strictly required to determine if he received any undisclosed kickbacks, referral fees, or financial incentives from the Guerra’s for steering me into this fraudulent transaction. If Robyn Jones is subject to an audit of her transactional history, Travis Pryor must be held to the same rigorous statutory standard. I will present this 4-year history during my testimony at his upcoming hearing.

4. Robyn Jones, Statutory Proof of Compensation, and Transaction Count

You have pre-determined that Robyn Jones will receive discipline, but not revocation, claiming the facts do not support it. This is a severe failure of regulatory oversight.

Under the Texas Real Estate License Act (TRELA), a broker cannot legally claim or collect a commission without a written, signed compensation agreement. The transactional file contains a signed “Compensation Agreement Between Brokers” bearing Robyn Jones’s unique license number (570708). This agreement is the legal mechanism that routed funds directly to her brokerage.

I am formally asking: Did TREC audit her bank records, tax filings, and corporate ledger to trace the money trail from this agreement, and how many other transactions did they discover she had with the Guerra’s?

Under TREC Rule §535.2(h)(5), she is legally required to maintain all receipts and disbursements of compensation for four years. Public records show a long-term, multi-transaction relationship between Robyn Jones’s sponsored entity (NextHome Woodland Springs) and the Guerra’s, including the listings at 310 Crosby Dr, Crosby, TX; 3019 Pilgrims Point, Pearland, TX; and 123 Fennel Road, Magnolia, TX.

If she received funds: She actively profited from a transaction executed via digital forgery and unlicensed activity.

If she did not receive funds: She allowed her professional identity, brokerage name, and state-issued license number to be utilized on legally binding contracts to facilitate fraud by unlicensed individuals.

Either scenario constitutes extreme bad faith and untrustworthiness, which legally warrants the revocation of her license. I expect a full audit of her financial records and a disclosure of her transaction volume with the Guerra’s, rather than a predetermined, lenient outcome.

Furthermore, if Robyn Jones claims she had no knowledge of this transaction, she is admitting to a complete and total abdication of her statutory duties. Under TREC Rule 535.2(a) and Texas Occupations Code § 1101.803, a sponsoring broker is strictly and legally responsible for all authorized acts of the sales agents they sponsor—meaning the buck stops with her for the actions of Mark L. Guerra.

Beyond general vicarious liability, Robyn Jones faces direct, independent regulatory exposure:

Association with Unlicensed Persons: Under TRELA § 1101.652(b)(11) and (26), the Commission is authorized to take disciplinary action against any broker who associates with or pays a commission to an unlicensed person who engages in activities requiring a license. By allowing her unique broker license number (570708) to be placed on a Compensation Agreement utilized by the unlicensed Javier Guerra, she has directly violated this statute.
Professional Legal Standards: According to her own public marketing and professional profiles, Robyn Jones actively brands herself to consumers as a top-producing broker and a ‘Licensed Attorney’ with expertise in contract law. As an officer of the court and a member of the State Bar of Texas, she is held to an elevated standard of professional conduct. She cannot claim administrative ignorance regarding the laws of digital forgery, identity theft, or the strict supervision of real estate transactions executed under her name.
Operating an Inactive Entity: Her associated brokerage entity, House of Chavez LLC (d/b/a NextHome Woodland Springs), was inactivated by the Texas Secretary of State. Under TREC Rule 535.53(a)(3), a business entity is legally required to notify the Commission within 10 days of receiving notice that it is no longer qualified to transact business in Texas. Under TREC rules, a business entity broker’s license automatically becomes inactive the moment it is unqualified to do business in the state. Conducting any real estate activities or routing commissions through an inactive entity is a severe violation of TREC Rule 535.120. Did she notify the Commission within the mandatory 10-day window? Did her brokerage continue to receive or process funds after its corporate charter was inactivated?

Letting a licensed attorney and designated broker avoid license revocation under these egregious circumstances is a mockery of TREC’s consumer protection mission. I expect a full audit of her financial transactions and records, which she was statutorily required to maintain for four years under TREC Rule 535.2(h).

5. Rebuttal of Jurisdictional Dismissals (Sanchez, Janz, and Perez)

You claim that Christian Sanchez (License #634430), Valerie Janz, and Jennifer Perez (License #616120) are outside TREC’s jurisdiction because they were “employees for a mortgage company” not engaged in brokerage activity. This is factually and legally incorrect. Valerie Janz and Jennifer Perez are not mere employees; they are the owners of The Owner Finance Company.

Furthermore, they utilized this entity to send a formal legal letter demanding that I vacate the property. That evidence was also provided to your agency. Issuing a notice to vacate and facilitating evictions are property management and leasing activities that strictly fall under TRELA’s jurisdiction. They were acting as landlords/property managers to finalize a fraudulent lease-to-purchase eviction, which absolutely constitutes “brokerage activity.” TREC v. Bradley Glen Davis (Case No. 240374). In that final order, the Commission explicitly ruled that an individual who agrees to “handle the three-day notices to vacate and evictions” on behalf of property owners for a fee is engaging in real estate brokerage activity under Section 1101.002(1) of the Texas Occupations Code. Because the individual performed these eviction activities without a license, TREC issued an administrative penalty and ordered him to cease and desist.

Under TRELA §1101.652(b)(2), the Commission has explicit authority to suspend or revoke a license if a license holder engages in conduct that constitutes dishonesty, bad faith, or untrustworthiness. Their bad-faith participation in a fraudulent closing, combined with issuing notices to vacate and Jennifer Perez’s active obstruction of justice (lying to a Constable to evade service of process on Mark Guerra), directly violates their licensing standards. TREC has full jurisdiction to discipline them. Furthermore, I am forwarding your written assessment to the Texas Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending (TDSML) so they can pursue the mortgage fraud that TREC is refusing to address.

6. Rebuttal of Owner Exemption and Demand for Criminal Referral of Javier Guerra

You state that because Javier Marko Guerra or STW300K Investments LLC owned the property, he is exempt from licensing requirements and therefore no criminal referral will be made.

While an owner can sell their own property under TRELA §1101.005, the owner exemption does not cover digital forgery or the fraudulent impersonation of active TREC licensees. Javier Guerra did not sign as an “owner”; he digitally forged the name of his son, Mark L. Guerra (License #800616), on the purchase contracts with Robyn Jones’s broker license on the Compensation Agreement. Using active, state-issued license numbers that do not belong to him to execute contracts constitutes criminal unlicensed brokerage under TRELA §1101.756.

Because your office is refusing to refer this blatant forgery to the authorities, I will submit this cryptographic Docusign evidence directly to the Harris County District Attorney’s Consumer Fraud Division and the Texas Attorney General’s Office to pursue criminal fraud and forgery charges.

Sincerely,

914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

The Ledger of Victims: A Statistically Impossible Pattern of Dispossession

Tameika Price’s harrowing experience is not an isolated incident; it is a meticulously engineered blueprint for dispossession. The criminal complaint pending before the District Attorney incorporates a verified, audited ledger of 20 separate pro se litigants experiencing the exact same tracking abnormalities, stripped notices, and manufactured defaults within Judge Thomas’s courtroom. ¹ Ms. Price explicitly demanded an investigation of over 200 cases to be investigated from Attorney Ayinde I. Ashford and Judge Jermaine Thomas to expose the sheer scale of this alleged assembly line of fraud. ¹

This massive volume of statistical consistency utterly removes any possibility of standard clerical error. It allegedly suggests a deliberate, highly lucrative assembly line designed to mercilessly process human lives and property into pure corporate revenue. 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Conclusion: Act Now

The most damning, terrifying revelation of this exhaustive forensic investigation is the total, absolute alleged collapse of institutional oversight. Local, county, and state regulatory entities—alongside major civil rights groups and agencies like Attorney Ben Crump, the NAACP, Public Integrity, the ACLU, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, The Federalist, the Pacific Legal Foundation, the Texas Rangers, the US Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, the National Bar Association, Senator Borris L. Miles, Okeefe Media Group, Katt Williams, the Sunset Advisory Commission, The Cochran Firm, and The ShadeRoom—have been fully served with certified forensic evidence of these massive penal code violations. Dr. Candice Matthews was willing to help, but the victim could not afford her publication fee of $3500 because the network had illegally frozen her accounts. Ms. Price stated, “Yet, these organizations have allegedly offered absolutely zero help at this time, and I am still patiently waiting because I know there is someone out there who will help me.”

The taxpayer dollars meant to police corruption have been completely subverted into administrative walls that trap victims and protect white-collar criminal syndicates. ¹

The victim allegedly maintains she received no justice, suspecting that illicit payoffs must be occurring because it is otherwise incomprehensible how clerks, lawyers, and judges would go to such extreme lengths to commit fraud against her using false documents and false transcripts. She asks a haunting, profound question: How can these alleged criminals be protected under the eyes of the law?

Reflecting on the overarching corruption, Tameika Price issued a profound final statement: “Consumer protection agencies like the Texas Department of Banking, TREC, and various consumer finance and mortgage lending boards appear designed to sue these companies merely to secure funding for themselves, not to obtain justice for the consumer. They register complaints seemingly to build their own multi-million-dollar lawsuits, while summarily denying the original victim’s claim without offering a dime, often telling victims to ‘go get an attorney’ fully knowing most cannot afford one. This system and its financial infrastructure are heavily biased. These agencies effectively operate using the public as informants solely to enrich themselves. You rarely, if ever, see a brown person win a case against a large corporation because the system allegedly does not allow it; yet the state agencies can sue them and get paid. To all the coders and spiritual workers out there, it is time to change these frequencies as a collective. Feel free to contact me also. We must start targeting the situations that need to be dismantled in this universe to stop so much unjustified suffering and put a stop to this bias and discriminatory treatment. To sit around and witness this injustice, knowing you have the power to change it, is pointless to have and claim the power.” 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

The victim’s viral mandate is clear, piercing, and undeniable: the public must wake up. Independent, aggressive investigative entities entirely outside the influence of the City of Houston must intervene immediately to strip away this corporate veil. ¹ By exposing these hidden municipal actors to the light of truth, [548491698719][719 414 819] are anchored to make sure they will get exposed for this systematic corruption. The time to act against this modern manifestation of financial slavery is now, before the dockets are scrubbed forever, the evidence is burned, and the next wave of victims is silently dispossessed. Stop allowing these stories to go viral and turn to gossip without justice.

The Bottom Line: A Summary for the General Public [548 491 698 719]

If you are not familiar with complex legal or professional jargon, here is exactly what is happening in simple terms:

When a tenant spoke up to demand basic, safe living conditions, the network allegedly retaliated by doing the following:

They allegedly locked her out of her online rent payment portal so they could falsely claim she missed a payment.
They allegedly ignored dangerous conditions, including a fire-retardant leak in the garage that caused the victim to slip and fall, and a 6-month elevator outage that forced the use of 10 flights of stairs.
They allegedly unlawfully towed her vehicle and her visitor’s vehicle under a newly forced, unilateral parking policy.
The bank allegedly illegally froze both her personal and business checking accounts (the personal checking account being the same one she used to pay legal fees) to destroy her finances, permanently closing the business account as well to prevent any business operation. They allegedly seized all her money after sending a misdirected demand letter to the wrong address.
When she reported this illegal bank freeze to the Texas Department of Banking, the agency allegedly refused to investigate—despite the fact that freezing a personal account requires a valid court order—because the bank is their untouchable “whale client.” The Texas Department of Banking also allegedly refused to force Frost Bank to provide Ms. Price’s CIF file and records, which she requested 3 times via certified return receipt mail.
The law firm allegedly worked with court clerks to hide her mail, alter dates on paperwork, and forge fake judgments so she would miss her new court dates without knowing it.
When she tried to fight back, specific court reporters (Darlene Stein, Laura Cuthrell, and Lettie Bernice Witter) allegedly stalled, chopped up the record, demanded illegal fees, and produced false transcripts that completely swapped her identity, scrubbed the judge’s actual rulings, and hid evidence that was presented in court. The appellate judges allegedly repeatedly ignored her requests for the original audio to make sure the companies won.
She sent multiple urgent emails directly to the court clerks, the Office of Court Administration, and filed emergency requests for oral hearings to stop the illegal dismissals and the massive property fraud. Yet, she was allegedly completely and systematically ignored, and her legal filings were kept hidden from the system for weeks.
They allegedly tried to plant multiple retaliatory, unserved lawsuits against her, inflating minor debts to a staggering $250,000 each, steered directly into corrupted judicial pipelines.
The agreed take-nothing judgment she won on June 5, 2025, signed by all attorneys ¹, was actually an allegedly orchestrated “trick” to vacate her JP victory and re-route her case directly into Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas’s court—where Attorney Ayinde Ashford’s cases are routinely funneled to secure automatic corporate wins regardless of the facts.¹
When she petitioned the Supreme Court of Texas (Case No. 25-1058), she detailed how Appellate Justices Amparo “Amy” Guerra and David Gunn allegedly aided and protected this fraud by denying her motions to compel the raw audio records. She also exposed how Justice Guerra allegedly procedurally violated mandatory rules by completely refusing to refer her Verified Motion to Recuse to the Administrative Judge, choosing instead to handle it herself and issue a self-serving denial.¹

Please text your email addresses or phone numbers to what’s app 512-645-9519 to be added for updates regarding her situation and justice and or to send her referrals for justice action.

918 775 698 181 8 • 719 31 • 8888 • 710 42

JS Bin

.owl-carousel .owl-video-play-icon{--wpr-bg-08830587-1b38-444b-9e0d-7bb44b2a0b0c: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/css/owl.video.play.png');}.error{--wpr-bg-8fa3846a-fdf8-4107-9ac4-39b6dfa82bc9: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/404-bg.png');}.link-holder{--wpr-bg-1334d6ec-4d50-4677-8953-72f68ef3090b: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/blog/5.png');}.lets-work{--wpr-bg-2e823672-f472-4a96-bd88-6cd88bf8f9db: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/lets-work-bg.jpg');}.boxed.pattern{--wpr-bg-895560e1-b7c1-4546-851e-383874c7568d: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/patterns/1.png');}.rll-youtube-player .play{--wpr-bg-6eace5ac-a514-49ca-bfa7-441f06a00cca: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-rocket/assets/img/youtube.png');}#daln-open{--wpr-bg-76e7e009-bf86-441f-9ce2-6cc1a8ada40f: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/live-news/public/assets/img/open-button.png');}#daln-close{--wpr-bg-02913812-cd22-42bf-b404-dc2149a07362: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/live-news/public/assets/img/close-button.png');}#daln-clock{--wpr-bg-11526555-9ad5-45d8-bbe7-80aaa29c83a5: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/live-news/public/assets/img/clock.png');}

News