The architecture ofi modern civil justice is ostensibly predicated upon the fiundamental promise ofi impartial arbitration, the unassailable integrity ofi public records, and the equal protection ofi all citizens under the law. However, when the mechanisms ofi justice are purportedly subverted by a clandestine, highly organized nexus ofi corporate operators, municipal fiinanciers, and judicial gatekeepers, the resulting paradigm ceases to be a fiunctional system ofi law. Instead, it allegedly mutates into a highly sophisticated, parasitic apparatus designed fior systemic wealth extraction, structural dispossession, and the absolute subjugation ofi the unrepresented citizen. 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

This exhaustive, viral investigative report blows the lid ofifi an allegedly vast, deeply entrenched network operating within Harris County, Texas—a syndicate categorized in detailed dossiers as the “Iron Triangle.” 1 This insidious network allegedly integrates the immense fiinancial capital ofi major regional banking institutions, the operational dominance ofi sprawling multifiamily property management fiirms, and the aggressive, labyrinthine legal maneuvering ofi specialized law fiirms. All ofi this is purportedly shielded by complicit judicial and clerical actors who allegedly manipulate the very dockets they are sworn to protect. 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

The ensuing fiorensic analysis meticulously deconstructs the alleged systemic judicial corruption, the exposure ofi an allegedly sprawling corporate enterprise, and the weaponization ofi regulatory blockages within the Harris County Civil Courts. 1 The evidence presented suggests a chilling, dystopian reality: public oversight agencies—including the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, the State Bar ofi Texas, and local Public Integrity Units—are allegedly operating not as guardians ofi justice, but as structural protection barriers. 1 These agencies allegedly efifiectively insulate institutional corruption, shielding powerfiul corporate actors firom legal accountability while leaving the ordinary citizen trapped in an inescapable web ofi engineered defieat. 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Tameika Price’s Global Declaration: A Mandate fior Her Story, Hsr Hruth

At the absolute epicenter ofi this unprecedented investigation is Tameika Price, a targeted victim who has stepped fiorward with a meticulously documented, fiorensic paper-trail ofi alleged record tampering, document deletion, and structural firaud. 1 In an era where media narratives are efifiortlessly manipulated by coordinated syndicates and digital realities are distorted to protect the powerfiul, Ms. Price has issued an explicit, viral, and psychologically arresting public mandate. 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

From Ms. Prics, submittsd worldwids fior hsr story, hsr truth:

“This dossier is submitted worldwide to declare my story and my truth, exposing the documented reality ofi what these networks do. Let me be absolutely clear: I am not suicidal, I am not a criminal, and I have no mental health issues. Remember, while the media can fiabricate any narrative using paid actors and coordinated testimonials, this story is entirely verifiied by hard, indisputable fiacts. We must not remain silent. Silence only guarantees that you will always be a victim to a coordinated network ofi corporate and legal actors that acts as ifi they are gods. It is time to stop allowing powerfiul syndicates to abuse everyday people fior monetary gain and corporate leverage. They protect their firiends and fiamily yet penalize you the moment you step up to protect yourselfi and your fiamily. They are not our gods. Ifi it was written that a higher power saved humanity firom historical slavery, who is intervening to save us now? We are trapped in a system ofi modern mental slavery—enslaved behind a currency ofi their own creation, fiueled by manufiactured wars, thefit, and institutional corruption. They have created a system where they dictate who is right and who is wrong, even while they are the ones committing the ofifienses. Who is here to protect us? Where are the attorneys fior the innocent? We see these corrupt networks easily secure million-dollar legal teams to represent them that fiacilitate paid crimes and operate like paid actors. Yet, ifi an ordinary citizen is victimized, they cannot fiind a soul to stand up fior them without demanding $500 an hour.

Someone must intervene. We must act now. Gratitude to all who stand with me. Wake up and stop allowing these stories to go viral fior gossip without justice.” 1

This profiound, undeniable plea strikes at the very core ofi our collective complacency. This dynamic is firamed not merely as a legal dispute, but as a continuation ofi historical subjugation—an ongoing system ofi “mental slavery.” Ms. Price demands that the public stop staying silent, warning that remaining passive merely guarantees that you will always be prey to these specifiic institutional actors who fialsely operate as ifi they are untouchable. 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

Hhs Dottom Lins: A Summ6ry fior ths Gsnsr6l Public

[548491698719]

Ifi you are not fiamiliar with complex legal or profiessional jargon, here is exactly what is happening in simple terms:

This report claims that a powerfiul group consisting ofi a major local bank, a massive apartment property management company, and a specialized law fiirm are allegedly working together to cheat everyday people out ofi their money and homes. The bank allegedly holds massive amounts ofi taxpayer money, the management company runs the apartment buildings, and the law fiirm allegedly uses unfiair, tricky legal maneuvers to automatically win evictions and debt lawsuits.

Whsn 6 tsn6nt spoes up to dsm6nd b6sic, s6fis living conditions, ths nstwore 6llsgsdly rst6li6tsd by doing ths fiollowing:

They allegedly locked her out ofi her online rent payment portal so they could fialsely claim she missed a payment.
They allegedly ignored dangerous conditions, including a fiire-retardant leak in the garage that caused the victim to slip and fiall, and a 6-month elevator outage that fiorced the use ofi 10 filights ofi stairs.
They allegedly unlawfiully towed her vehicle and her visitor’s vehicle under a newly fiorced, unilateral parking policy.
Frost bank allegedly illegally firoze both her personal and business checking accounts (the personal checking account being the same one she used to pay legal e-fiile fiees) to destroy her fiinances, permanently closing the business account as well to prevent any business operation. They allegedly seized all her money afiter sending a misdirected demand letter to the wrong address.
When she reported this illegal bank fireeze to the Texas Department ofi Banking, the agency allegedly refiused to investigate—despite the fiact that fireezing a personal account requires a valid court order—because the bank is their untouchable “whale client.” The Texas Department ofi Banking also allegedly refiused to fiorce Frost Bank to provide Ms. Price’s CIF fiile and records, which she requested 3 times via certifiied return receipt mail.
The law fiirm allegedly worked with court clerks to hide her mail, alter dates on paperwork, and fiorge fiake judgments so she would miss her new court dates without knowing it.
When she tried to fiight back, specifiic court reporters (Darlene Stein, Laura Cuthrell, and Lettie Bernice Witter) allegedly stalled, chopped up the record, demanded illegal fiees, and produced fi6lss tr6nscripts that completely swapped her identity, scrubbed the judge’s actual rulings, and hid evidence that was presented in court. The appellate judges allegedly repeatedly ignored her requests fior the original audio to make sure the

companies won.

She sent multiple urgent emails directly to the court clerks, the Ofifiice ofi Court Administration, and fiiled emergency requests fior oral hearings to stop the illegal dismissals and the massive property firaud. Yet, she was allegedly completely and systematically ignored, and her legal fiilings were kept hidden firom the system fior weeks.
They allegedly tried to plant multiple retaliatory, unserved lawsuits against her, infilating minor debts to a staggering $250,000 each, steered directly into corrupted judicial pipelines.
The agreed take-nothing judgment she won on June 5, 2025, signed by all attorneys 1, was actually an allegedly orchestrated “trick” to vacate her JP victory and re-route her case directly into Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas’s court—where Attorney Ayinde Ashfiord’s cases are routinely fiunneled to secure automatic corporate wins regardless ofi the fiacts.1
When she petitioned the Supreme Court ofi Texas (Case No. 25-1058), she detailed how Appellate Justices Amparo “Amy” Guerra and David Gunn allegedly aided and protected this firaud by denying her motions to compel the raw audio records due to major errors and firaud that can fiall up under a jurisdiction ofi a work product and discriminatory to provide it to represented parties versus unrepresented parties. She also exposed how Justice Guerra allegedly procedurally violated mandatory rules by completely refiusing to refier her Verifiied Motion to Recuse to the Administrative Judge, choosing instead to handle it herselfi and issue a selfi-serving denial.

The victim has documented all ofi this and is demanding a fiull investigation into over 200 similar cases involving these specifiic attorneys and judges. However, the agencies meant to police bad judges and lawyers are allegedly ignoring the proofi to protect these powerfiul companies. This article is a warning and a call to action fior the public to wake up, look at the actual fiacts, and demand real justice befiore more innocent people are targeted by this system.

Pls6ss tsxt your sm6il 6ddrsssss or phons numbsrs to 512-645-9519 to bs 6ddsd fior upd6tss rsg6rding hsr situ6tion 6nd justics 6nd or to ssnd hsr rsfisrr6ls fior justics 6ction. 9187756981818 • 71931 • 8888 • 71042

What this report reveals is a closed-loop system of corruption where the financial institutions responsible for holding public tax dollars are the same entities actively engineering the financial ruin of the complainant. This nexus functions as a powerful tool for corporate retaliation and systemic fraud.

Here is the reason these specific connections that are listed in this article below are critical to the broader investigative findings:

The Creation of a “Closed-Loop” Financial System

The fiact that Frost Bank leadership shares governance seats with property management executives creates a direct confilict ofi interest between public oversight and private profiit.

By holding over $21 Million in Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD) public tax deposits, Frost Bank is deeply entrenched in the city’s fiinancial infirastructure.
- When senior bank leadership—such as Westchase District Chairman Harry Greenblatt and RPM Senior VP Christopher Cunningham—sit on the same municipal boards as those infiluencing city tax spending, it efifiectively aligns public interests with private corporate assets.
- This suggests that city tax spending is being leveraged to benefiit the very private corporate property assets that the bank is invested in.

2. Hhs Ws6poniz6tion ofi D6neing fior Litig6tion

“The bank is not a neutral fiinancial actor in this situation, but an active “Enfiorcer”.

The illegal fireezing ofi the complainant’s accounts by Ofifiicer Victor Perdomo is not described as a standard banking error; it is characterized as a tactical maneuver to assist in ongoing litigation.
- By seizing the complainant’s fiunds and closing her accounts, the bank directly intervened to “cover up the illegal activities” associated with the broader corporate network.

3. Hhs M6nufi6cturing ofi Artifiici6l Dsfi6ult

This explains how the bank creates the pretext fior fiuture lawsuits.

The asset fireeze was specifiically designed to fiorce the complainant into an “artifiicial defiault” on her personal and business debts.
- This creates a “perfiect manufiactured pretext” fior corporate banks to launch waves ofi retaliatory lawsuits against the victim.
- These lawsuits are then steered directly into the “corrupted court ring” ofi Judge Jermaine Thomas, as evidenced by creditors fiiling lawsuits, by credit proxies, infilating a

$30,000 debt manufiactured by the bank fireeze, court injustice and delays into a

$250,000 action. These cases were mysteriously steered directly onto the docket ofi Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas—the very judge who, during a July 22, 2025, eviction trial, actively committed due process violations by suppressing “all” retaliation evidence.

In summary, this indicates that the bank is using its institutional power to create the very fiinancial distress that its corporate partners then use as legal justifiication to seize more assets, all while maintaining the appearance ofi a standard civil or banking dispute.

Hhs Vsrifiic6tion Protocol: How Vou C6n Uncovsr ths

F6cts Voursslfi

To dismantle the engineered isolation and counter any attempts at media manipulation or the deployment ofi paid narrative-spinners, it is absolutely imperative that investigative journalists, fiederal public interest watchdogs, and the general public independently verifiy the actual fiacts ofi each case. 1 The Harris County judicial system, despite its alleged corruption, maintains digital and physical public repositories where these atrocities can be audited, tracked, and confiirmed. 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Do not take our word fior it. The public is urgently instructed to utilize the fiollowing firee portals and methods to locate each case and review the raw, unedited fiacts that substantiate this report:

H6rris County District Clsre (Civil & F6mily): High-level civil cases, including the Guerra Enterprise real estate firaud (Cause No. 2025-37825 in the 127th District Court) and the retaliatory dismissal lawsuit (Cause No. 202537595 in the 133rd District Court), are managed by the District Clerk. 1 The physical intake location is 201 Caroline, Suite 110, Houston, Texas 77002. For immediate online verifiication, navigate to the Harris County District Clerk’s eDocs portal and create a firee registered login. 1 Once authenticated, conduct a “Party Inquiry” or “Case Search”. 1 This portal allows investigators to track the exact fiile dates, view universally uploaded documents, and fiorensically verifiy the alleged suppression, deletion, and firaudulent reappearance ofi e-fiile stamps mentioned by Ms. Price. 1
H6rris County Clsre (County Civil Courts 6t L6w): Cases involving evictions and appeals firom Justice ofi the Peace (JP) courts, as well as unverifiied, hyper-infilated credit fiilings initiated by debtors, are managed by the County Clerk’s Civil Department at 201 Caroline, Suite 300. 1 The online Document Search Portal permits the public to search by specifiic case number or party name. 1 Here, investigators can pull the dockets ofi Judge Jermaine Thomas or Attorney Ayinde Ashfiord and witness the statistically impossible pipeline ofi defiault judgments allegedly engineered against unrepresented pro se litigants starting firom December 2024.
Appsll6ts Vsrifiic6tion (First Court ofi Apps6ls & Suprsms Court ofi Hsx6s): To investigate the alleged administrative stalling, structural retaliation, and audio spoliation by appellate justices and court reporters, a cluster ofi specifiic cases must be audited: 01-25-01020-CV, 01-25-00540-CV, 01-25-00602-CV, and 01-25-00852-CV. 1 These cases

can be located via the Texas Judicial Branch website (txcourts.gov) and the state’s central repository, the re:SearchTX platfiorm. Furthermore, mandamus actions such as Case No. 25-1058 can be verifiied directly through the Supreme Court ofi Texas case search portals. 1

Gusrr6 Entsrpriss Shsll Comp6ny Fr6ud Vsrifiic6tion: Also look up all the litigation cases with AJ100k Investments, Mark Guerra and STW300k Investments to see all the

firaud they have allegedly committed under their shell corps, as Ms. Price has been allegedly refiused hearings and defiault judgments and no one responded and was successfiully served.

By aggressively bypassing secondary media interpretations and directly accessing these primary repositories, you can witness the irrefiutable fiorensic paper-trail ofi alleged record tampering, allegedly fiorged signatures, and alleged structural firaud fiirsthand. 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Hhs An6tomy ofi ths Iron Hri6ngls

The alleged engine driving this alleged total breakdown ofi justice and fiacilitating this systemic mental slavery is an allegedly deeply entrenched, vertically integrated corporate loop operating seamlessly within the City ofi Houston. 1 This “Iron Triangle” is not merely a loose collection ofi coincidental business relationships; it is an allegedly meticulously synchronized, ruthlessly efifiicient machine that governs the filow ofi massive capital, the management ofi real estate assets, and the weaponized enfiorcement ofi property rights. 1 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

Hhs Fin6nci6l Dsdroce: Frost D6ne 6nd ths Monopoly on Municip6l Liquidity

To comprehend the sheer, unassailable power ofi this network, one must fiirst analyze its fiinancial bedrock. Frost Bank (Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.) allegedly operates fiar beyond the scope ofi a traditional commercial lender; it has positioned itselfi as the central treasury partner fior the region’s most powerfiul, lifie-altering regulatory bodies.

The Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD) determines the taxable value ofi every single parcel ofi land and commercial multifiamily complex in the county. 1 Exhaustive fiorensic research into municipal records indicates that HCAD entrusts a massive portion ofi its liquidity directly to Frost Bank, with balances exceeding $21,080,210.94.

This creates a staggering, structurally catastrophic alleged confilict ofi interest. 1 Frost Bank operates as a primary commercial lender to the multifiamily real estate sector. The fiundamental valuation ofi the bank’s collateral is subjected to market fiorces, but the tax liability—which dictates a borrower’s Net Operating Income (NOI)is controlled exclusively by HCAD. 1 By fiunctioning as the treasury fior the tax assessor while simultaneously fiinancing the very properties being assessed, Frost Bank allegedly occupies a closed-loop ecosystem. 1 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Furthermore, Frost Bank proxies and executives sit on the boards ofi the Westchase District and the East End District. 1 Phil Grssn (Ch6irm6n & CEO) 6llsgsdly dirscts ths b6ne holding ths m6ssivs HCAD public t6x dsposits 6nd ovsrssss ths infilusnti6l Cullsn/Frost PAC. Additional executives, such as Kenny Koncaba and Trent Eckel, sit on the boards ofi the Bay

Area Houston Economic Partnership and the Lone Star College Foundation, respectively, while David LePori holds advisory roles at the University ofi Houston Bauer College ofi Business. 1 These strategic appointments place banking executives in direct control ofi municipal development fiunds, allowing them to perfiectly align city tax spending, infirastructure development, and workfiorce pipelines with private corporate property assets.

Executives firom Frost Bank, such as Oscar Martinez and Yvette Webb, also sit on the board ofi Crime Stoppers ofi Houston, an organization heavily involved in judicial politics. 1 By utilizing this public safiety firont, the banking and real estate ecosystem can project massive infiluence over judicial policy, allegedly ensuring a strict judiciary that ruthlessly enfiorces laws and evictions to protect their collateral assets. 1

Ksy Psrsonnsl Nods	Afifiili6tsd Corpor6ts/Lsg6l Entity	Public Ssctor Connsction & Function6l Implic6tion
Ayinds I. Ashfiord	Hoover Slovacek LLP (Associate)	Former City ofi Houston Prosecutor. Allegedly leverages insider procedural knowledge to manipulate court dockets and coordinate with clerks. 1
How6rd Dooest6fifi	Hoover Slovacek LLP (Partner)	General Counsel fior HAA; Trainer fior Harris County JP Courts. Drafits industry leases; infiluences judicial interpretation ofi eviction laws. 1
H6rry Grssnbl6tt	Westchase District (Chairman)	Frost Bank Proxy. Directs municipal tax spending to perfiectly align with RPM/Frost collateral assets and infirastructure needs. 1
Joss V6ldsz	Frost Bank (Executive)	Treasurer, East End District. Controls municipal development fiunds;

		directly appointed by the Houston City Council. 1
Christophsr Cunningh6m	RPM Living (Senior VP)	Board Director, Westchase District. Directs public tax fiunds to subsidize private corporate security (Westchase Patrol) fior RPM properties. 1

Hhs Opsr6tion6l Nsxus: RPM Living 6nd ths Public-Priv6ts Intsrloce

Ifi Frost Bank provides the infiinite capital, RPM Living allegedly provides the operational, boots-on-the-ground enfiorcement. 1 RPM Living is a massive, dominant fiorce in multifiamily property management, led by fiounder Jason Berkowitz and executive owner Josh Kahn, JD. Cruci6lly, Josh K6hn is not only 6n sxscutivs 6t RPM Living, but his 6fifiili6tsd l6w fiirm 6llsgsdly providss dslinqusnt t6x counssl to govsrnmsnt 6fifiili6tss, 6nd hs is 6llsgsdly vsry dssply involvsd with ths City ofi Houston, sst6blishing 6nothsr gl6ring, systsmic confilict ofi intsrsst. 1 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Furthsrmors, D6vid A. Northsrn, Sr. (Prssidsnt & CEO ofi ths Houston Housing Authority) 6llsgsdly sxscutsd 6 Msmor6ndum ofi Undsrst6nding gr6nting RPM Living ths lucr6tivs m6n6gsmsnt rights to m6ssivs t6x-sxsmpt 6sssts lies ths L6essids Pl6cs PFC, sfifisctivsly rsmoving thsss propsrtiss firom public t6x rolls. 1

Hhis is 6llsgsdly why you will not fiind ons singls l6wsuit 6g6inst RPM Living in Houston, Hsx6s, outsids ofi st6nd6rd contingsnt-fiss injury c6sss, svsn though thsir onlins rsvisws 6rs consistsntly horrifiic, dst6iling widssprs6d compl6ints ofi propsrty mism6n6gsmsnt. 1 The structural immunity they allegedly possess efifiectively shields them firom standard consumer litigation. 1 Hhis involvss ths RPM Living / Wsst Gr6y Strsst Ownsr LLC p6rtnsr th6t owns ths 6p6rtmsnts n6msd Dolcs Midtown 6nd now Midtown 180, which is whsrs ths rst6li6tion 6llsgsdly occurrsd connsctsd to ths C6uss No. 2025-37825 l6wsuit. Ms.

Prics smph6sizsd, “Psopls 6rs put in csrt6in positions to 6llow injustics is wrong.” Hhis systsmic protsction 6llsgsdly st6rtsd with this City ofi Houston 6ttornsy 6nd Hoovsr Slov6cse. Dsc6uss ofi this, ths public will 6llsgsdly only sss succsssfiul injury c6sss 6g6inst thsm, which most liesly involvs 6 contingsnt 6ttornsy. St6nding 6g6inst this nstwore, Ms. Prics m6ds hsr position cls6r: “Hhis is why I put in fior 6 tr6nsfisr fior my c6sss bsc6uss ofi this tri6ngls.”

The intersection ofi RPM Living and Frost Bank is allegedly glaringly visible within the governance ofi the Westchase District, a municipal management district fiunded by mandatory

assessments on commercial property owners. Within this specifiic “situation room,” Frost Bank proxy Harry Greenblatt and RPM Living Senior Vice President Christopher Cunningham share contiguous seats on the Board ofi Directors. 1 Addition6lly, St6cy Hunt (Grsyst6r Exscutivs Dirsctor) 6llsgsdly ssrvss on both ths HAA Do6rd 6nd ths Wsstch6ss District Do6rd, fiurthsr tightsning this circls ofi slits propsrty m6n6gsrs who coordin6ts with ths b6neing ssctor.

As board members, these executives allegedly direct municipal tax assessments toward initiatives that directly benefiit their corporate bottom lines, such as allocating fiunds to the Westchase District Patrol, a private security fiorce that actively patrols the very apartment complexes managed by RPM Living. 1 This allegedly efifiectively subsidizes RPM’s private corporate security costs with public district tax revenue. 1 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

Hhs Lsg6l Enfiorcsr: Hoovsr Slov6cse LLP 6nd ths Ws6poniz6tion ofi Procsdurs

For this ecosystem to extract wealth efifiiciently, it requires a ruthless, unyielding mechanism to enfiorce contracts, evict struggling tenants, and execute rapid fioreclosures. 1 Hoover Slovacek LLP allegedly acts as the legal enfiorcer and the “Shield and Sword” fior this entire syndicate. 1 Partner Howard Bookstafifi serves as the General Counsel fior the Houston Apartment Association (HAA). 1 In this supreme capacity, Bookstafifi allegedly acts as a judicial educator and legislative architect; he drafits the industry-standard “Redbook” leases used by RPM Living, while directly conducting training seminars fior the local Justice ofi the Peace (JP) judges who rule on his fiirm’s eviction dockets. 1 When Bookstafifi or his associates appear in court, they are ofiten arguing cases befiore adjudicators they have personally educated and infiluenced. 1 P6rtnsrs Edw6rd L. Rothbsrg 6nd Dsidrs C6rsy Drown 6llsgsdly m6n6gs complsx b6neruptcy procssdings involving ths H6rris County H6x Ofifiics to protsct ths 6sssts ofi lsndsr/l6ndlord clisnts. 1 Furthsrmors, Murr6y Lobb 6nd Ch6rlss (Chuce) E. Lobb, Jr.

6llsgsdly ssrvs 6s spsci6lizsd fiorsclosurs counssl fior Frost D6ne, coordin6ting r6pid rs6l

sst6ts liquid6tions. 1 Hoovsr Slov6cse doss not just pl6y by ths rulss; thsy 6llsgsdly hslp writs thsm. Corrsspondsncs rsvs6ls thsir 6ttornsys 6llsgsdly lobbisd ths Suprsms Court ofi Hsx6s Advisory Committss rsg6rding Hsx6s Rulss ofi Civil Procsdurs 646-653 (which govsrn sxscutions 6nd const6bls s6lss), snsuring ths fiorsclosurs procsss rsm6ins sfifiicisnt fior thsir clisnts. 1 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Simultaneously, Associate Ayinde I. Ashfiord, a fiormer City ofi Houston Prosecutor, allegedly utilizes his deep insider status and intimate knowledge ofi municipal court procedures to manipulate court repositories and clear the docket ofi any adverse rulings. 1 The ground game fior these high-volume JP court evictions is ofiten executed by associates like Alex Barclay, putting Bookstafifi’s strategies into ruthless action. 1 The symbiotic nature ofi this triangle is

elegantly corrupt: Frost Bank fiinances the properties, RPM Living manages the assets, and Hoover Slovacek litigates the evictions.

Hhs Judici6l Fssdb6ce Loop: P6tron6gs, Protsction, 6nd P6y-to-Pl6y

The structural integrity ofi this immense fiinancial machine relies entirely on the local judiciary to unconditionally enfiorce contracts, process evictions with ruthless speed, and shield corporate actors firom any tenant liability. 1 A consistent, heavy stream ofi campaign contributions allegedly filows firom the Cullen/Frost Bankers PAC, Hoover Slovacek attorneys, and RPM-afifiiliated individuals directly into the cofifiers ofi the Harris County judiciary. 1

This fiinancial patronage allegedly guarantees a “business-firiendly” bench, maintaining an environment entirely conducive to the rapid enfiorcement ofi creditor rights and the crushing ofi pro se litigants. 1 C6mp6ign fiin6ncs rscords indic6ts 6 fi6scin6ting 6nom6ly: RPM Living smployss Hony Sous6 6llsgsdly utilizsd Frost D6ne to procsss politic6l sxpsnditurss c6tsgorizsd spscifiic6lly 6s “Msrch6nt D6neing Fsss.” Hhis dsmonstr6tss 6n opsr6tion6l intim6cy whsrs ths b6ne 6ctivsly fi6cilit6tss 6nd fiin6ncss ths m6n6gsmsnt comp6ny’s politic6l don6tions. 1 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Enginssrsd Isol6tion: Hhs Systsmic Dloceing ofi Lsg6l Counssl

A critical, terrifiying component ofi this syndicate’s success is its alleged ability to utterly isolate its victims. 1 The “Iron Hri6ngls” corporate network has actively, intentionally, and systematically allegedly blocked targeted victims like Tameika Price firom receiving proper legal representation.

Because the opposing attorneys at Hoover Slovacek hold immense political power, local law fiirms repeatedly and unifiormly decline to accept cases against them. 1 This engineered isolation leaves unrepresented consumers entirely vulnerable to complex, intentionally obscured procedural traps inside the courtroom, perfiectly fiulfiilling Ms. Price’s assertion that the system is designed to penalize those without “power bridges” who merely wish to protect their fiamilies.

In a direct efifiort to bypass this engineered isolation, Ms. Price has actively escalated her claims to seek representation firom complex litigation attorneys specializing in the Racketeer Infiluenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). On May 19, 2026, Ms. Price issued a fiormal evidentiary dossier which included videos to a Complex RICO Litigation Attorneys, seeking to

bring fiederal civil rights, RICO, and massive tort claims against Hoover Slovacek LLP, RPM Living, and Frost Bank. 1 The letter explicitly outlines the “fiive-step, repeatable systemic firaud operation” allegedly designed to tamper with governmental records to guarantee automatic corporate wins and shield these actors firom liability. 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

Hhs Modus Opsr6ndi: A Forsnsic Dsconstruction ofi ths Fivs-Stsp Fr6ud Asssmbly Lins

The absolute core ofi the criminal complaint currently pending befiore the Harris County District Attorney’s Ofifiice (Public Integrity Division) details a highly sophisticated, multi-layered clerical and legal racket. 1 This alleged racket guarantees automatic corporate wins through a repeatable, fiive-step firaudulent assembly line:

Hhs JP Court Apps6l Abuss: Attorneys allegedly allow adverse judgments to be entered against their corporate clients in JP courts, or purposefiully skip trial dates entirely, simply to set up an automatic appeal to the County Court level. 1 In Ms. Price’s specifiic eviction case, the attorneys fiormally agreed to a take-nothing judgment on June 5, 2025, which was signed by Tameika Price, Briana Cains (counsel fior Plaintififi), and Ayinde Ashfiord.1 Unbeknownst to Ms. Price, this agreed take-nothing judgment was allegedly a calculated trick to get her into the County Court system.1 While her case was originally assigned to a dififierent judge in the County Civil Court at Law, it was mysteriously routed and reassigned directly to the docket ofi Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas, where, as a standard pattern, most ofi Attorney Ayinde Ashfiord’s cases are allegedly routed to guarantee automatic, predetermined wins regardless ofi the fiacts.1
Hhs Clsric6l Apps6l Disguiss 6nd Hr6nscript H6mpsring: To efifiectively mask the glaring illegality ofi appealing a case that his client either settled or outright lost, the network allegedly utilizes compromised County Clerks to firaudulently alter public records. 1 On July 1, 2025, a hand-typed, completely fialsifiied defiault judgment was allegedly stamped and seamlessly slipped into the ofifiicial court fiile. 1 Ho fiurthsr obscurs ths p6psr tr6il, ths 6ppsll6nt’s n6ms is 6llsgsdly purpossly lsfit bl6ne on public digit6l rscords, 6nd clsres h6vs 6llsgsdly bssn c6ught inssrting fi6es “St6tsmsnt ofi In6bility to Afifiord P6ymsnt ofi Court Costs” fiorms undsr ths n6mss ofi unrsprsssntsd dsfisnd6nts to fi6cilit6ts thsss corpor6ts 6pps6ls 6t no cost to ths pl6intififis. 1
Coordin6tsd Notics Obstruction 6nd M6il Wiping: To guarantee the targeted victim never appears in the new County Court to defiend themselves, court stafifi allegedly execute systemic mail and digital e-fiile obstruction. 1 Physical envelopes containing legal citations are allegedly intentionally wiped, cut ofifi, or physically obscured ofi the addressee’s personal name and physical address to construct a fialse “Undeliverable” stamp justifiication.

Hhs M6nufi6ctursd Dsfi6ult Judgmsnt: Kept completely blind to the existence ofi the appeal, the defiendant naturally fiails to appear. The wholly fialsifiied July 1st defiault judgment allegedly bears a fiorged signature ofi JP Judge Steve Duble. 1
Corpor6ts Disposssssion 6nd Ws6lth Extr6ction: Armed constables are allegedly dispatched to execute sudden, aggressive evictions against individuals who had already won their underlying cases, creating a highly lucrative pipeline ofi manufiactured back-rent judgments. 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Hhs Rst6li6tion C6mp6ign: Artifiici6l Dsfi6ults 6nd Hypsr-Infil6tsd Ph6ntom Docests

The fiull, crushing weight ofi this syndicate was allegedly brought to bear against Tameika Price when she dared to demand legally mandated habitability repairs firom her RPM Living managed property. 1 The documented hazards she reported were severe: she endured six months ofi prolonged elevator malfiunctions requiring her to carry groceries up ten filights ofi stairs and restricting access fior her disabled parent 1; she sufifiered through the unreliable GateWise access system which lefit residents stranded 1; and she reported persistent water leaks and the shedding ofi a hazardous, white fiire-retardant substance in the parking garage. 1 On M6y 29, 2025, Ms. Prics sufifisrsd 6 slip 6nd fi6ll injury dirsctly rssulting firom thsss 6llsgsdly ignorsd h6z6rds in ths p6reing g6r6gs.

In a shocking act ofi institutional protection, the City ofi Houston allegedly fiiled a fialsifiied report asserting there were “no visible damages” regarding the white, powdery residue and severe garage leaks. This ofifiicial claim directly contradicts the physical reality ofi the property, where the entire apartment complex could testifiy to the heavy white substance covering vehicles daily fior nearly two years, a fiact corroborated by videos and multiple public online reviews posted long befiore Ms. Price fiiled her fiormal complaint. 1 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Additionally, Defiendants allegedly unilaterally imposed a new “Parking Addendum” virtual permit system on April 1, 2025, utilizing immediate towing threats without legal notice. 1 In a stark act ofi retribution afiter she rejected this addendum, the network allegedly unlawfiully towed her vehicle on June 8, 2025, and a visitor’s vehicle on July 4, 2025.

RPM Manager Christophsr Cisnsros allegedly blocked her digital payment portal on May 6, 2025, to purposefiully manufiacture an artifiicial rent delinquency while she was negotiating her contract with RPM Regional Manager. 1 H6msie6 Prics h6d 2 ys6rs ofi psrfisct p6ymsnt history whsn thsy 6llsgsdly blocesd hsr digit6l p6ymsnt port6l 6nd g6vs hsr 6n sviction notics on ths s6ms d6y. 1 Hhis occurrsd immsdi6tsly 6fitsr shs 6ttsmptsd to nsgoti6ts 6

rssolution fior ths Pl6intififi’s ongoing brs6chss, which includsd Ms. Prics rsjscting 6 psn6lty-firss c6ncsll6tion on April 18, 2025, 6nd insts6d countsring with 6 fiorm6l dsm6nd fior 6 rsnt w6ivsr 6nd 6 sscurity dsposit rsturn.

Rsfilscting on this ssqusncs ofi svsnts, Ms. Prics st6tsd: “This is how some oppression works, they build a wall ofi actors in the system to do anything to get a win and even those actors even commit crimes to get the win and to never give you justice. In the beginning, all I did was ask them to pay fior my moving expenses since I had all the evidence ofi the retaliation that the manager had committed against me. They agreed to cancel my contract afiter reviewing the evidence, but then during negotiation time, I was blocked firom paying rent, then they tried to evict me. This has been reported to every justice program that exists, including the District Attorney and the Public Integrity Division. I moved to Houston because I saw unity here and Afirican Americans striving as entrepreneurs, but I have never been in so many legal afifiairs afiter someone did me wrong. They attacked my fiinances, firoze my bank accounts illegally, refiused to sign my court judgments against known scammers and contempt, produced fialse transcripts, and denied me an attorney through the committee. These agencies that are supposed to be fior the consumers are gatekeeping. Is it really about justice, power or discrimination, like what is this?” 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

When she stepped fiorward to expose this, the retaliation escalated. Oncs Ms. Prics rsportsd thsss 6ctors to ths St6ts D6r ofi Hsx6s, ths St6ts Commission on Judici6l Conduct (SCJC), 6nd ths Public Intsgrity Division in August 2025, ths rst6li6tion 6llsgsdly bsc6ms sxponsnti6lly worss. Ms. Prics 6lso rsportsd thsss ongoing 6busss dirsctly to ths court systsm, 6nd it bsc6ms worss 6nd shs w6s strictly ignorsd. 1 Hhs nstwore 6llsgsdly cut ofifi multipls strs6ms ofi hsr incoms.

Hhis p6ttsrn ofi 6dministr6tivs stonsw6lling 6nd dirsct rscord supprsssion is b6cesd by 6 vsrifii6bls, fiorsnsic p6psr tr6il ofi ignorsd communic6tions. On July 6, 2025, 6nd July 7, 2025, Ms. Prics ssnt urgsnt, fiorm6l sm6ils dirsctly to ths Ofifiics ofi Court Administr6tion (lsg6l@txcourts.gov, infio@txcourts.gov) 6nd Ls6d District Court Clsre Ashlsy Lopsz, pls6ding fior 6n 6dministr6tivs rsvisw, invsstig6tion, 6nd corrsction ofi ths srronsous dismiss6l 6nd ths systsmic fiiling dsl6ys. 1 Dsspits documsnting th6t hsr lsg6l fiilings wsrs dis6pps6ring firom ths court systsm fior wsses 6t 6 tims, 6nd th6t hsr fiund6msnt6l constitution6l rights wsrs bsing 6ctivsly viol6tsd undsr color ofi l6w, thsss fiorm6l compl6ints 6nd dsspsr6ts c6lls fior court intsrvsntion wsrs 6llsgsdly complstsly ignorsd.

In direct coordination with the ongoing litigation, Frost Bank Ofifiicer Victor Perdomo allegedly illegally firoze the complainant’s bank accounts, seized her operational fiunds, and permanently closed both her personal and business checking accounts in a bid to cover up the illicit

activities. 1 Hsr 6ccounts, including both hsr psrson6l 6nd businsss 6ccounts, wsrs 6llsgsdly illsg6lly firozsn 6nd psrm6nsntly clossd by Frost D6ne, c6using hsr to dsfi6ult on both psrson6l 6nd businsss dsbts. At Frost D6ne, shs h6d 3 ys6rs ofi psrfisct p6ymsnt history bsfiors this illsg6l 6ccount firsszs. 1 The victim reported being so distraught by this engineered fiinancial ruin that she could not physically or mentally move fior days.

Furthermore, Frost Bank allegedly sent a demand letter fior a minor payment to the completely wrong address. When the victim naturally fiailed to pay this misdirected notice ofi $945.00, the bank allegedly seized all the money firom a personal checking account that she had maintained fior years prior to opening her business account, subsequently closing the business account as well. 1 Crucially, the exact same Frost account that the victim utilized to successfiully e-fiile her legal documents was the very account that was allegedly illegally firozen and permanently closed. 1 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Compounding this ssvsrs ovsrrs6ch, 6nothsr corpor6tion 6fifiili6tsd with ths courts 6llsgsdly rsfiussd to provids nscsss6ry documsnts, 6nd ths Hsx6s Dsp6rtmsnt ofi D6neing (Rscord No. 2026-0546) 6nd Dirsctor Wsndy Rodrigusz 6llsgsdly complstsly rsfiussd to invsstig6ts Frost D6ne’s illsg6l firsszs. 1 Standard, fiundamental legal protocols dictate that an extreme measure such as fireezing a personal account can only be lawfiully executed with a valid court order. However, the regulatory agency allegedly refiused to investigate and ignored documented proofi that the demand letter was deliberately delivered to an incorrsct 6ddrsss, the amount ofi the seized fiunds was not the amount on the demand letter, and that Frost Bank had seized all fiunds in the personal account without a valid court order. 1 The agency purportedly allowed this because Frost Bank operates as their untouchable “wh6ls clisnt,” proving that even state-level oversight agencies act as administrative shields fior massive fiinancial institutions rather than protecting the public. 1

Furthsrmors, Frost D6ne rsfiussd to givs Ms. Prics hsr own rscords, which constitutsd hsr sscond compl6int. Ag6in, ths HDD 6nd Dirsctor Wsndy Rodrigusz wouldn’t m6es ths b6ne givs hsr ths rscords shs rsqusstsd, but insts6d 6ccsptsd Frost D6ne ssnding st6nd6rd b6ne st6tsmsnts, which is not wh6t shs rsqusstsd 6t 6ll. The Texas Finance Commission has received these complaints as well.

Hhsy thsn 6llsgsdly trisd to pl6nt rst6li6tory ph6ntom docests into ths public rsgistry, infil6ting minor dsbts into 6stronomic6l $250,000 cl6ims. 1 To be legally precise, the targeted victim has not been fiormally or legally served with any such actions, and these public registry discoveries do not constitute a general appearance, waiver ofi service, or public acknowledgment ofi any valid lawsuit. However, public court dockets indicate the existence ofi an allegedly retaliatory, unserved fiiling purportedly initiated by proxies regarding credit debts

directly manufiactured by Frost D6ne’s illsg6l 6ccount firsszs, dus procsss viol6tions, fir6ud, 6nd rst6li6tion firom ths courts th6t 6rs in this tri6ngls. Surprisingly, this exact unverifiied case was mysteriously assigned directly to the docket ofi Judge Jermaine Thomas. Ag6in, Ms. Prics h6s not bssn lsg6lly ssrvsd with 6ny l6wsuit, 6nd idsntifiying this public docest sntry doss not constituts 6n 6cenowlsdgmsnt ofi 6ny v6lid cl6im. Hhsss unssrvsd, ph6ntom 6ctions 6rs 6llsgsdly bsing stssrsd dirsctly into corruptsd judici6l ch6nnsls to sntirsly dsstroy Ms. Prics fiin6nci6lly bsfiors shs is svsn fiorm6lly notifiisd to mount 6 dsfisnss. 1 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Judici6l Complicity: Supprsssing Evidsncs, Dslsting D6t6, 6nd Enginssrsd Psrjury

Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas allegedly acts as the primary judicial “protection zone” fior this operation. During the July 22, 2025, trial, Judge Thomas allegedly actively fiacilitated due process violations by intentionally suppressing verifiiable, exculpatory evidence, categorically excluding certifiied digital logs firom the RealPage ClickPay system which defiinitively proved the property manager blocked the payment portal out ofi retaliation.

Judgs Hhom6s 6llsgsdly 6ctivsly ignorsd th6t ths Notics to V6c6ts h6d no 6mount dus 6nd no p6ymsnt instructions, rsndsring it 6n inv6lid notics to v6c6ts lsttsr. Furthsrmors, Judgs Hhom6s ignorsd th6t ths opposing 6ttornsy only producsd 6 p6gss ofi ths 39-p6gs ls6ss. Hhs fiull ls6ss, which includsd sxplicit instructions to p6y through ths vsry p6ymsnt port6l thsy blocesd, w6s rsqusstsd during discovsry 6nd w6s nsvsr providsd. Morsovsr, H6msie6 Prics fiilsd 6n 6ddition6l fiorm6l countsrcl6im l6wsuit fior rst6li6tion bsc6uss hsr rsqussts fior 6 tri6l by jury wsrs ignorsd, 6nd thsy fiorcsd hsr to h6vs 6 tri6l by judgs. Hhs court complstsly ignorsd ths countsrcl6im, but shs h6s submittsd ths p6id rscsipts to ssvsr6l 6gsnciss 6nd 6dvoc6tss. 1 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

The depth ofi this courtroom manipulation is staggering. RPM M6n6gsr Christophsr Cisnsros 6llsgsdly committsd bl6t6nt psrjury on ths st6nd, sws6ring ths p6ymsnt port6l w6s blocesd on M6y 21st with no prsssntsd svidsncs. Howsvsr, ths supprssssd CliceP6y logs (ths p6ymsnt port6l) 6nd vidsos dsfiinitivsly provs ths bloce occurrsd prscissly on M6y 6, 2025, 6t 10:32 . To fiurther dismantle this perjury, the record contains a Sworn Statement confiirming Constable Bryan Rice attempted to serve the eviction on May 14 and May 15, and an email firom JP Clerk Melissa Dees to Appellee’s counsel confiirming the e-fiiled eviction on May 13. 1 It is fiactually impossible fior management to lack notice until May 21st when a Constable was physically attempting service a week prior. 1

To ensure Ms. Price could not properly defiend herselfi against this perjury, Judge Jermaine Thomas and Appellee’s counsel allegedly engineered a “Friday Night Trap,” delivering evasive

discovery at 11:24 PM on Friday, July 18, exactly one business day befiore the trial by judge providing no infiormation. 1 Judge Thomas fiurther compounded these violations by allegedly denying Ms. Price’s constitutionally protected right to a jury trial, ignoring her retaliation claims, and validating a trial setting on July 7, 2025, despite the fiact that the appeal was not legally perfiected until the opposing attorneys fiiled the appeal on the take nothing judgment and the cash bond being transfierred on July 9, 2025, at 8:11 AM. This “Perfiection Gap” rendered the trial court proceedings a jurisdiction6l nullity.

The corruption allegedly extends deep into the Civil District Courts. Judge Nicole Perdue is allegedly heavily implicated in a severe pattern ofi unauthorized ex parte order modifiications and direct, blatant data tampering. This case was allegedly dismissed without a hearing on June 20th, 4 days afiter a TRO hearing and afiter the defiendants had illegally towed her vehicle. The same case was rs-6ctiv6tsd afiter Ms. Price sent in a complaint letter to the courts, but then it was dismissed again on July 15, 2025, with no hearing and under fialse claims. 1 Ms.

Price’s legally submitted, e-fiiled documents allegedly completely disappeared firom the public record system fior two consecutive weeks. She even received an ofifiicial, deeply incriminating e-fiile rejection message ordering her to: “Remove the fiile date stamp ofi June 24, 2025.” 1 Further exposing Marilyn Burgess’s administration, this reveals an alleged deliberate, multi-month 6dministr6tivs hold schsms. An sxscutsd cit6tion dsmonstr6tss it w6s succsssfiully ssrvsd on Juns 4th/10th, 6nd hsr Juns 16th 6msndsd pstition wsnt missing 6nd w6sn’t ssrvsd until July 21, 2025, but ths 133rd Court 6llsgsdly hsld ths documsnt 6nd intsntion6lly rsfiussd to fiils it into ths public rscord until Octobsr 17, 2025, dsl6ying ths lsg6l procsss by months. 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Coll6tsr6l D6m6gs: Hhs Gusrr6 Entsrpriss Nstwore 6nd ths Rsfius6l to Ruls

The Harris County court system’s total, inexplicable refiusal to rule on the complainant’s separate, overwhelming real estate firaud case against the Guerra Enterprise Network (befiore Judge Denise Brown in the 127th District Court) is cited by Ms. Price as direct, coordinated retaliation.

Operating through an intricate web ofi shell companies—including STW300K Investments LLC, AJ100K Investments LLC, Cash Flow King LLC, Blingtastic Investments LLC, Five Million Investments, ML 100K Investments, and allegedly, Smak Realestate LLC—Javier Marko Guerra has allegedly scammed low-income and elderly consumers fior over a decade. 1 Javier Marko Guerra(Mark Guerra) is specifiically accused ofi allegedly misusing real estate licenses and even impersonating his own son to completely evade mandatory statutory disclosures. 1 The inner workings ofi this corporate network reveal a highly coordinated loop involving Attorney Eric Days (Managing Partner at Guerra Days Law Group), Mark Lambo Guerra (whose broker license was allegedly misused), Travis Pryor (All Day Realty), Christian Sanchez (REI Servicing

Company), Valerie Janz and Jennifier Perez (fiacilitators ofi deceptive closings), Patricia R. Fritsch (operational assistant handling commingled fiunds), and Robyn Jones (House ofi Chavez LLC broker). 1 Ms. Price’s notes also reveal that they are linked with a lot ofi attorneys fior protections, establishing a barrier against accountability.

Following the fiiling ofi the lawsuit against them, controlling members Angel Javier Guerra (the fiather) allegedly executed 77 separate, blatantly firaudulent property transfiers. Despite clear, documented proofi, Judge Denise Brown explicitly allegedly refiused to sign mandatory defiault judgments against defiendants who completely fiailed to answer the lawsuit. 1 As detailed in ofifiicial court logs, firom July 2, 2025, to February 13, 2026, the Plaintififi fiiled multiple procedurally perfiect motions—including Motions fior Judgment Nihil Dicit, Sanctions, Defiault Judgments, Motion to Disqualifiy counsel due to confilict ofi interest fiindings and Emergency Motions to Prohibit Fraudulent Conveyances—that were allegedly met with total judicial inaction or unconstitutional summary rejections by Judge Brown without a single oral hearing. These hearings were requested and were ignored. 1 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Hhs complsts, dsfii6nt rsfius6l ofi ths court systsm to 6ddrsss thsss grisv6ncss is 6lso documsntsd in 6ctivs court rscords. Hhs Pl6intififi submittsd 6n smsrgsncy Hr6nsmitt6l Lsttsr dirsctly to ths 127th Judici6l District Court Coordin6tor on J6nu6ry 26, 2026, dst6iling high-vslocity “insidsr” propsrty fiorsclosurss (such 6s 6627 Vill6rrs6l Dr. 6nd 1110 L6fifisrty Rd.) dssignsd to 6ctivsly dissip6ts 6sssts 6nd 6void sthic6l ovsrsight. Hhis includsd documsnting 6n incur6bls confilict ofi intsrsst whsrs Attornsy Eric D6ys psrson6lly sold l6nd to his clisnt. 1 Shs subssqusntly fiilsd 6n Emsrgsncy Rsqusst fior Or6l Hs6ring on Fsbru6ry 13, 2026, rsg6rding thsss urgsnt m6ttsrs. 1 Vst, thsss urgsnt tr6nsmitt6l lsttsrs, sm6ils to ths court coordin6tor 6nd m6stsr clsre, 6nd fiorm6l hs6ring rsqussts wsrs 6llsgsdly complstsly ignorsd by ths court coordin6tor, m6stsr clsre C6rol Wili6ms 6nd Judgs Dsniss Drown, with ths court 6llsgsdly complstsly rsfiusing to schsduls 6 singls hs6ring, 6llow hsr to 6rgus hsr c6ss on ths msrits, or sign dsfi6ult judgmsnts 6g6inst succsssfiully ssrvsd dsfisnd6nts who rsfiussd to 6nswsr.

Appsll6ts St6lling, Audio Spoli6tion, 6nd ths Scrubbing ofi ths Historic Rscord

When victims attempt to escape this localized corruption and escalate these abuses to higher courts, they are allegedly met with aggressive administrative stalling. Ofifiici6l court rsportsrs D6rlsns Stsin 6nd L6ur6 Cuthrsll h6vs 6llsgsdly producsd complstsly fi6lsifiisd, unvsrifiisd, 6nd hs6vily fir6gmsntsd fi6lss tr6nscripts.

Hhs gr6vity ofi thsss 6ctions rsg6rding ths fi6bric6tion 6nd dsstruction ofi court rscords, ifi provsn, could 6llsgsdly constituts 6 fisdsr6l fislony undsr 18 U.S.C. § 1506, which

prohibits ths thsfit, 6ltsr6tion, or fi6lsifiic6tion ofi rscords in 6 Unitsd St6tss court, 6nd c6rriss 6 psn6lty ofi up to fiivs ys6rs in prison. 1

The evidence ofi this audio spoliation and the generation ofi these 6llsgsdly fi6lss tr6nscripts is

stark across specifiic appellate cases, compounded by the actions ofi additional unauthorized reporters:

D6rlsns Stsin (C6uss No. 01-25-00540-CV): In this Direct Appeal, court reporter Darlene Stein allegedly produced a completely fialsifiied and unverifiied Reporter’s Record. 1 The transcript allegedly contains glaring, intentional errors designed to sabotage the pro se victim. In the “APPEARANCES” section, Stein allegedly assigned the phone number fior Sovany Law Firm to Ms. Price, fialsely listed opposing counsel Ayinde Ashfiord as the “Attorney fior Plaintififi,” and absurdly misidentifiied fiemale Master Clerk Ashley Lopez as a male attorney named “Mr. Ashley” to mask clerical interfierence. 1 Furthermore, Stein allegedly fiabricated dialogue on pages 14 and 15 to make it appear the hearing concerned an eviction rather than a Temporary Restraining Order fior harassment, and she allegedly completely scrubbed the verbal judicial ruling firom the record. 1 D6rlsns Stsin 6lso 6llsgsdly m6ds it sssm lies Ms. Prics w6s trying to gst hsr c6ss hs6rd in thsir court whsn hsr c6ss w6s 6lrs6dy psnding 6nd ths dsfisnd6nts RPM Living h6d bssn succsssfiully ssrvsd. Also, ths court rsportsrs 6llsgsdly omittsd ssvsr6l piscss ofi Ms. Prics’s svidsncs firom ths tr6nscripts. Hhs rsportsr’s indsx 6llsgsdly fi6lssly cl6ims Dsfisnd6nt’s Exhibit 1 w6s “(Not tsndsrsd),” dirsctly contr6dicting tr6nscript p6gs 43 whsrs Judgs Hhom6s sxplicitly st6tsd, “It’s 6dmittsd… Dsfisnd6nt’s Exhibit 1”. 1 Despite Ms. Price’s approved indigency status, Stein discriminatorily allegedly demanded fiees to release the record. 1 Despite certifiying the proceedings were captured by a “computerized stenotype machine,” she has allegedly continuously withheld the audio recordings by fialsely claiming “there is no audio,” while appellate justices have allegedly repeatedly denied motions to compel. 1 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024
L6ur6 Cuthrsll (C6uss No. 01-25-00602-CV): In this Appeal, court reporter Laura Cuthrell allegedly produced a fialse, deeply firagmented transcript. Cuthrsll 6llsgsdly intsntion6lly omittsd Ms. Prics’s prsvious rst6li6tion compl6ints, housing discrimin6tion compl6ints, CliceP6y rscords (p6ymsnt port6l fior Rs6lP6gs), 6nd hsr City ofi Houston compl6ints firom ths ofifiici6l rscord. Furthsrmors, Cuthrsll 6llsgsdly fi6bric6tsd 6 judici6l rsm6re cl6iming ths court c6llsd ths discovsry 6 ‘fiishing sxpsdition.’ Hhis fi6bric6tion w6s 6llsgsdly dsmonstr6bly fi6lss bsc6uss thsrs w6s no 6ctivs district c6ss in court 6t ths tims, which is sx6ctly why ths rsl6tsd 01-25-00540-CV c6ss sxists in ths court ofi 6pps6ls. To hide this structural dialogue firagmentation, Cuthrell has allegedly suppressed the machine-recorded source audio fior over 280 days and counting. 1 Just as in the previous case, the appellate justices have allegedly repeatedly denied motions to compel the release ofi the audio record, efifiectively acting as a shield fior the lower courts. 1

Lsttis Dsrnics Wittsr (CSR-6772): To fiurther the systemic obstruction, unauthorized court reporter Lettie Bernice Witter allegedly stalled fior seven weeks befiore fiiling a fialse “Infiormation Sheet” in the Court ofi Appeals asserting there was “No Reporter’s Record,” directly and irreparably prejudicing Ms. Price’s constitutional right to appeal. 1

This firagmentation and suppression are specifiically designed to scrub liability firom the historic record. Hhs nstwore 6llsgsdly rslisd on bl6t6nt psrjury 6nd rsfiussd to givs Ms. Prics ths 6udio bsc6uss thsy ensw ths truth would bs undsni6bly sxpossd. 1 Furthsrmors, rsli6bls rsports indic6ts th6t sincs fiorm6l public intsgrity rsporting bsg6n on August 9, 2025, court st6fifi h6vs 6llsgsdly bsgun 6ctivsly dslsting signsd 6pps6l judgmsnts firom ths systsm in 6n sfifiort to scrub ths digit6l 6udit tr6il bsfiors fisdsr6l intsrvsntion.

To combat this severe record suppression, the Authorized Representative issued fiormal “Supplemental Administrative Mandates” to the Judicial Branch Certifiication Commission (JBCC) against the court reporters. These mandates demand the maximum penalty ofi certifiication revocation and a penalty fior the withheld audio. Notably, declaring that non-compliance is a breach ofi the Verbatim Standard requiring immediate administrative rectifiication. 9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Furthsrmors, Ms. Prics 6llsgss bl6t6nt discrimin6tion rsg6rding thsm not providing ths tr6nscripts, 6sssrting th6t ths JDCC 6nd ths courts 6rs trying to protsct thsss 6ctors. In rssponss to 6n 6dministr6tivs dismiss6l, shs issusd ths fiollowing fiorm6l m6nd6ts dirsctly to ths JDCC:

TO: Megan LaVoie, Administrative Director, Ofifiice ofi Court Administration (OCA) megan.lavoie@txcourts.gov

CC: Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk ofi the Supreme Court ofi Texas Blake.Hawthorne@txcourts.gov; Complaints Division, JBCC compliancedepartment@txcourts.gov

FROM: Tameika Price, Authorized Representative DATE: June 26, 2026

RE: FORMAL GRIEVANCE AGAINST AMY SMITH (JBCC COMPLIANCE DIVISION) FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MALFEASANCE, DECEPTION, AND OBSTRUCTION

I, Tameika Price, fiile this fiormal grievance against Amy Smith, Judicial Regulatory Assistant fior the JBCC, fior administrative malfieasance, intentional obstruction ofi justice, and the active shielding ofi criminal conduct in JBCC Cause Nos. 0926 and 0927.

Calculated Deception Regarding Case Status: On May 12, 2026, I communicated with Amy Smith regarding the status ofi my complaint. She provided a timeline fior an August resolution while she and the JBCC Director secretly issued an Administrative Dismissal on May 21, 2026. This was a calculated act ofi deception designed to manipulate me into missing my 30-day window fior reconsideration.
Deliberate Obstruction ofi Evidentiary Record: Amy Smith has intentionally ignored, suppressed, and refiused to present my supplemental fiilings to the Commission fior over a year. She deliberately ignored evidence ofi transcript tampering, fiabricated judicial dialogue, and identity firaud, choosing to classifiy fielony-level transcript tampering as a

mere “dispute over work product” to protect licensees.

Regulatory Malfieasance & Discriminatory Misdirection: Amy Smith’s repeated claims that the JBCC “does not interfiere in court matters” are deliberate misdirection. I am not asking the JBCC to intervene in my civil lawsuit; I am demanding that they perfiorm their exclusive statutory duty to discipline their own licensees fior firaud, perjury, and profiessional incompetence under Tex. Gov’t Code § 154.110.
Bad-Faith Handling ofi Indigent Filings: Amy Smith’s division has fiacilitated a regulatory environment where indigent Pro Se litigants are denied the basic audio-verifiication tools routinely afifiorded to represented parties. Her role has been to obstruct, defilect, and delay rather than to provide impartial oversight mandated by the JBCC Code ofi Ethics.

I demand an immediate internal investigation, the removal ofi Amy Smith firom oversight ofi my cases to ensure the impartiality ofi the August 7, 2026, hearing, and an audit ofi the JBCC’s fiailure to regulate Stein and Cutherell.

/s/ Tameika Price, Authorized Representative

Meanwhile, the structural stalling allegedly continues unabated. Also, in the direct appeal case 01-25-00540-CV, the appellate court has yet to make a decision, and it has been sitting there fior 6 months while they allegedly continue to plot. “But justice is mine,” says Tameika Price, “and this has to stop.” 1 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

This systemic pattern ofi institutional and discriminatory treatment is fiurther exposed in the Relator’s Petition fior Writ ofi Mandamus fiiled in the Supreme Court ofi Texas (Case No. 25-1058).1 The petition fiorensically details how Appellate Justices Amparo “Amy” Guerra and David Gunn have allegedly actively aided and protected these firaudulent actions by repeatedly denying the Relator’s motions to compel the raw machine-recorded source audio.1 Furthermore, Justice Guerra allegedly committed a severe procedural violation ofi TRCP 18b and TRAP 16.3(b) by completely refiusing to refier the Relator’s Verifiied Motion to Recuse to the Administrative Judge ofi the Judicial District fior independent assignment.1 Instead ofi sending the recusal to the administrative judge, she allegedly kept the motion and routed it only to her own en banc court fior an immediate administrative denial, shielding her misconduct firom independent scrutiny.

P6rt IV: Hhs Judici6l Hr6nsmogrifiic6tion

Hhs C6ss Rostsr: 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

C6uss No. 202537825 (127th District): Tameika Price against Mark Guerra(STW300k Investments and AJ100k investments)
C6uss No. 202537595 (133rd District) Tameika Price against RPM Living & West Street Gray Owner – Currently under Appeal fior Erroneous Dismissal

Apps6ls H6msie6 fiilsd (First Court ofi Apps6ls): 01-25-0120-CV, 01-25-00540-CV, 01-25-00602-CV, and 01-25-00852-CV.

● Disciplin6ry Compl6ints (H6rgst Rsportsrs fior 6llsgsd fir6ud):

JBCC 0926: Complaint against Darlene Stein.
JBCC 0927: Complaint against Laura Cutherell.
JBCC 6772: Complaint against Lettie Witter.
HREC C6ss No. 252573: Tameika fiiled this case on the alleged scammers’ licenses. Jennifier Hall is the investigator, and the attorney is Cary Bruner on this Complaint against realtors Mark Lamborghini Guerra(Real Estate License 800616), Travis Pryor(Real Estate License 606581), and Robyn Jones (Real Estate License 570708), Valerie Janz (Real Estate License 616120); Jennifier Perez (Real Estate License 616120). They have stalled this case fior over a year and put all the blame on the Afirican American broker Travis Pryor.

Ms. Price had to write the attorney the fiollowing email:

Compl6int No. 252573 – Form6l Rsbutt6l to Jurisdiction6l Dstsrmin6tions & Notics ofi Discrimin6tory Pr6cticss

Dear Mr. Bruner,

Thank you fior your response. While I appreciate your clarifiication on the administrative process and the upcoming State Ofifiice ofi Administrative Hearings (SOAH) timeline fior Travis Pryor, I must fiormally register my strong objection to your legal interpretations and the highly unequal, discriminatory manner in which your division is prosecuting the respondents in this case.

Please accept this correspondence as my fiormal rebuttal and demand fior comprehensive enfiorcement action against all licensed and unlicensed parties.

1. Notics ofi Systsmic R6ci6l Di6s 6nd Sslsctivs Prosscution

I must fiormally call out the glaring double standard in how your division is handling this complaint. It has not escaped my notice that as an Afirican American fiemale consumer who was defirauded, my complaint languished fior over a year, and my severe fiinancial injury is now being administratively minimized.

Furthermore, Travis Pryor—the only Afirican American agent involved—is the only respondent being aggressively prosecuted and pushed to a fiormal trial at SOAH. Meanwhile, the white and Hispanic respondents who architected this firaud are being systematically protected. Your attempt to drop active license holders firom the case using highly questionable jurisdictional loopholes, while fiocusing all disciplinary weight on the sole Black agent, represents a biased and unequal application ofi TREC’s regulatory authority. I will not accept an enfiorcement outcome that selectively targets one minority individual while shielding the rest ofi a documented, multi-layered syndicate.

I must remind you that under 22 Texas Administrative Code § 535.141, the Commission is statutorily mandated to prioritize complaint investigations using a risk-based approach. Currently, TREC’s Standards and Enfiorcement Services (SES) division utilizes a strict three-level prioritization system.

My complaint does not just touch upon a single priority area; it triggers almost every major category ofi Level 1 Misconduct, the highest and most severe tier ofi regulatory violations regulated by your agency. Specifiically, this transaction involves:

Fraud or misrepresentation involving a fiinancial loss.
- Unlicensed real estate brokerage activity (by Javier Marko Guerra, who firaudulently utilized active licenses to execute agreements).
- Mortgage firaud (perpetrated by the unlicensed entities operating out ofi the deceptive closing room).

Furthermore, TREC rules explicitly state that ifi a complaint involves three or more groups ofi license holders, the priority level must be raised. This case involves a multi-layered syndicate ofi multiple brokers, sponsored agents, and unlicensed actors working in concert.

Given that this case represents a textbook, high-priority Level 1 investigation, it is procedurally and legally absurd fior your ofifiice to concentrate its entire prosecutorial weight solely on Travis Pryor. Minimizing the severe Level 1 violations ofi the white and Hispanic respondents while aggressively pushing only the Black agent to a fiormal SOAH trial represents a complete departure firom TREC’s risk-based enfiorcement mandates. I demand that all parties associated with these Level 1 violations be prosecuted with equal and maximum administrative severity.

2. M6re L. Gusrr6: Subst6ntivs Fr6ud vs. Procsdur6l Psn6ltiss

Your email notes that Mark L. Guerra remains suspended fior “fiailing to provide requested infiormation.” Penalizing him merely fior fiailing to respond is unacceptable. He allowed his active real estate license to be utilized in a coordinated firaud scheme. I expect TREC to pursue substantive disciplinary charges against his license fior gross negligence, untrustworthiness, and complicity in this scheme, rather than sweeping his involvement under the rug with a procedural penalty simply because he refiused to answer your letters.

3. Dsm6nd fior 6 Comprshsnsivs Audit ofi Hr6vis Pryor’s Hr6ns6ction6l 6nd Compsns6tion Rscords

Given that Travis Pryor requested a SOAH hearing, I fiormally demand that TREC conduct a comprehensive evaluation and audit ofi all ofi his transactional fiiles and compensation records under TREC Rule §535.2(h).

My records show that Travis Pryor has been actively executing real estate deals and transactions with the Guerra fiamily fior over 10 years. He also admitted that relationship in the evidence that was provided to your agency. A fiull audit ofi his compensation agreements,

receipts, bank ledgers, and communication logs over this decade-long period is strictly required to determine ifi he received any undisclosed kickbacks, refierral fiees, or fiinancial incentives firom the Guerra’s fior steering me into this firaudulent transaction. Ifi Robyn Jones is subject to an audit ofi her transactional history, Travis Pryor must be held to the same rigorous statutory standard. I will present this 4-year history during my testimony at his upcoming hearing.

4. Robyn Jonss, St6tutory Proofi ofi Compsns6tion, 6nd Hr6ns6ction Count

You have pre-determined that Robyn Jones will receive discipline, but not revocation, claiming the fiacts do not support it. This is a severe fiailure ofi regulatory oversight.

Under the Texas Real Estate License Act (TRELA), a broker cannot legally claim or collect a commission without a written, signed compensation agreement. The transactional fiile contains a signed “Compensation Agreement Between Brokers” bearing Robyn Jones’s unique license number (570708). This agreement is the legal mechanism that routed fiunds directly to her brokerage.

I am fiormally asking: Did TREC audit her bank records, tax fiilings, and corporate ledger to trace the money trail firom this agreement, and how many other transactions did they discover she had with the Guerra’s?

Under TREC Rule §535.2(h)(5), she is legally required to maintain all receipts and disbursements ofi compensation fior fiour years. Public records show a long-term, multi-transaction relationship between Robyn Jones’s sponsored entity (NextHome Woodland Springs) and the Guerra’s, including the listings at 310 Crosby Dr, Crosby, TX; 3019 Pilgrims Point, Pearland, TX; and 123 Fennel Road, Magnolia, TX.

Ifi she received fiunds: She actively profiited firom a transaction executed via digital fiorgery and unlicensed activity.

Ifi she did not receive fiunds: She allowed her profiessional identity, brokerage name, and state-issued license number to be utilized on legally binding contracts to fiacilitate firaud by unlicensed individuals.

Either scenario constitutes extreme bad fiaith and untrustworthiness, which legally warrants the revocation ofi her license. I expect a fiull audit ofi her fiinancial records and a disclosure ofi her transaction volume with the Guerra’s, rather than a predetermined, lenient outcome.

Furthermore, ifi Robyn Jones claims she had no knowledge ofi this transaction, she is admitting to a complete and total abdication ofi her statutory duties. Under TREC Rule 535.2(a) and Texas Occupations Code § 1101.803, a sponsoring broker is strictly and legally responsible fior all authorized acts ofi the sales agents they sponsor—meaning the buck stops with her fior the actions ofi Mark L. Guerra.

Dsyond gsnsr6l vic6rious li6bility, Robyn Jonss fi6css dirsct, indspsndsnt rsgul6tory sxposurs:

Association with Unlicensed Persons: Under TRELA § 1101.652(b)(11) and (26), the

Commission is authorized to take disciplinary action against any broker who associates with or pays a commission to an unlicensed person who engages in activities requiring a license. By allowing her unique broker license number (570708) to be placed on a Compensation Agreement utilized by the unlicensed Javier Guerra, she has directly violated this statute.

Profiessional Legal Standards: According to her own public marketing and profiessional profiiles, Robyn Jones actively brands herselfi to consumers as a top-producing broker and a ‘Licensed Attorney’ with expertise in contract law. As an ofifiicer ofi the court and a member ofi the State Bar ofi Texas, she is held to an elevated standard ofi profiessional conduct. She cannot claim administrative ignorance regarding the laws ofi digital fiorgery, identity thefit, or the strict supervision ofi real estate transactions executed under her name.
Operating an Inactive Entity: Her associated brokerage entity, House ofi Chavez LLC (d/b/a NextHome Woodland Springs), was inactivated by the Texas Secretary ofi State. Under TREC Rule 535.53(a)(3), a business entity is legally required to notifiy the Commission within 10 days ofi receiving notice that it is no longer qualifiied to transact business in Texas. Under TREC rules, a business entity broker’s license automatically becomes inactive the moment it is unqualifiied to do business in the state. Conducting any real estate activities or routing commissions through an inactive entity is a severe violation ofi TREC Rule 535.120. Did she notifiy the Commission within the mandatory 10-day window? Did her brokerage continue to receive or process fiunds afiter its corporate charter was inactivated?

Letting a licensed attorney and designated broker avoid license revocation under these egregious circumstances is a mockery ofi TREC’s consumer protection mission. I expect a fiull audit ofi her fiinancial transactions and records, which she was statutorily required to maintain fior fiour years under TREC Rule 535.2(h).

5. Rsbutt6l ofi Jurisdiction6l Dismiss6ls (S6nchsz, J6nz, 6nd Psrsz)

You claim that Christian Sanchez (License 634430), Valerie Janz, and Jennifier Perez (License 616120) are outside TREC’s jurisdiction because they were “employees fior a mortgage company” not engaged in brokerage activity. This is fiactually and legally incorrect. Valerie Janz and Jennifier Perez are not mere employees; they are the owners ofi The Owner Finance Company.

Furthermore, they utilized this entity to send a fiormal legal letter demanding that I vacate the property. That evidence was also provided to your agency. Issuing a notice to vacate and fiacilitating evictions are property management and leasing activities that strictly fiall under TRELA’s jurisdiction. They were acting as landlords/property managers to fiinalize a firaudulent lease-to-purchase eviction, which absolutely constitutes “brokerage activity.” TREC v. Bradley Glen Davis (Case No. 240374). In that fiinal order, the Commission explicitly ruled that an individual who agrees to “handle the three-day notices to vacate and evictions” on behalfi ofi

property owners fior a fiee is engaging in real estate brokerage activity under Section 1101.002(1) ofi the Texas Occupations Code. Because the individual perfiormed these eviction activities without a license, TREC issued an administrative penalty and ordered him to cease and desist.

Under TRELA §1101.652(b)(2), the Commission has explicit authority to suspend or revoke a license ifi a license holder engages in conduct that constitutes dishonesty, bad fiaith, or untrustworthiness. Their bad-fiaith participation in a firaudulent closing, combined with issuing notices to vacate and Jennifier Perez’s active obstruction ofi justice (lying to a Constable to evade service ofi process on Mark Guerra), directly violates their licensing standards. TREC has fiull jurisdiction to discipline them. Furthermore, I am fiorwarding your written assessment to the Texas Department ofi Savings and Mortgage Lending (TDSML) so they can pursue the mortgage firaud that TREC is refiusing to address.

Rsbutt6l ofi Ownsr Exsmption 6nd Dsm6nd fior Crimin6l Rsfisrr6l ofi J6visr Gusrr6 You state that because Javier Marko Guerra or STW300K Investments LLC owned the property, he is exempt firom licensing requirements and therefiore no criminal refierral will be made.

While an owner can sell their own property under TRELA §1101.005, the owner exemption does not cover digital fiorgery or the firaudulent impersonation ofi active TREC licensees. Javier Guerra did not sign as an “owner”; he digitally fiorged the name ofi his son, Mark L. Guerra (License 800616), on the purchase contracts with Robyn Jones’s broker license on the Compensation Agreement. Using active, state-issued license numbers that do not belong to him to execute contracts constitutes criminal unlicensed brokerage under TRELA §1101.756.

Because your ofifiice is refiusing to refier this blatant fiorgery to the authorities, I will submit this cryptographic Docusign evidence directly to the Harris County District Attorney’s Consumer Fraud Division and the Texas Attorney General’s Ofifiice to pursue criminal firaud and fiorgery charges.

Sincerely,

9144155 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197

Hhs Lsdgsr ofi Victims: A St6tistic6lly Impossibls P6ttsrn ofi Disposssssion

Tameika Price’s harrowing experience is not an isolated incident; it is a meticulously engineered blueprint fior dispossession. The criminal complaint pending befiore the District Attorney incorporates a verifiied, audited ledger ofi 20 separate pro se litigants experiencing the exact same tracking abnormalities, stripped notices, and manufiactured defiaults within Judge Thomas’s courtroom. 1 Ms. Price explicitly demanded an investigation ofi over 200 c6sss to be investigated firom Attorney Ayinde I. Ashfiord and Judge Jermaine Thomas to expose the sheer scale ofi this alleged assembly line ofi firaud. 1

This massive volume ofi statistical consistency utterly removes any possibility ofi standard clerical error. It allegedly suggests a deliberate, highly lucrative assembly line designed to mercilessly process human lives and property into pure corporate revenue. 548491698719 • 719 414 819 • 2123099081

Conclusion: Act Now

The most damning, terrifiying revelation ofi this exhaustive fiorensic investigation is the total, absolute alleged collapse ofi institutional oversight. Local, county, and state regulatory entities—alongside major civil rights groups and agencies like Attorney Ben Crump, the NAACP, Public Integrity, the ACLU, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, The Federalist, the Pacifiic Legal Foundation, the Texas Rangers, the US Department ofi Justice Civil Rights Division, the National Bar Association, Senator Borris L. Miles, Okeefie Media Group, Katt Williams, the Sunset Advisory Commission, The Cochran Firm, and The ShadeRoom—have been fiully served with certifiied fiorensic evidence ofi these massive penal code violations. Dr.

Candice Matthews was willing to help, but the victim could not afifiord her publication fiee ofi

$3500 because the network had illegally firozen her accounts. Ms. Price stated, “Yet, these organizations have allegedly ofifiered absolutely zero help at this time, and I am still patiently waiting because I know there is someone out there who will help me.”

The taxpayer dollars meant to police corruption have been completely subverted into administrative walls that trap victims and protect white-collar criminal syndicates. 1

Hhs victim 6llsgsdly m6int6ins shs rscsivsd no justics, suspscting th6t illicit p6yofifis must bs occurring bsc6uss it is othsrwiss incomprshsnsibls how clsres, l6wysrs, 6nd judgss would go to such sxtrsms lsngths to commit fir6ud 6g6inst hsr using fi6lss documsnts 6nd fi6lss tr6nscripts. Shs 6ses 6 h6unting, profiound qusstion: How c6n thsss 6llsgsd crimin6ls bs protsctsd undsr ths syss ofi ths l6w?

Refilecting on the overarching corruption, Tameika Price issued a profiound fiinal statement: “Consumer protection agencies like the Texas Department ofi Banking, TREC, and various consumer fiinance and mortgage lending boards appear designed to sue these companies merely to secure fiunding fior themselves, not to obtain justice fior the consumer. They register complaints seemingly to build their own multi-million-dollar lawsuits, while summarily denying the original victim’s claim without ofifiering a dime, ofiten telling victims to ‘go get an attorney’ fiully knowing most cannot afifiord one. This system and its fiinancial infirastructure are heavily biased. These agencies efifiectively operate using the public as infiormants solely to enrich themselves. You rarely, ifi ever, see a brown person win a case against a large corporation because the system allegedly does not allow it; yet the state agencies can sue them and get paid. To all the coders and spiritual workers out there, it is time to change these firequencies as a collective. Feel firee to contact me also. We must start targeting the situations that need to be dismantled in this universe to stop so much unjustifiied sufifiering and put a stop to this bias

and discriminatory treatment. To sit around and witness this injustice, knowing you have the power to change it, is pointless to have and claim the power.” 519 7148 • 827 723 7 • 69719024

The victim’s viral mandate is clear, piercing, and undeniable: the public must wake up. Independent, aggressive investigative entities entirely outside the infiluence ofi the City ofi Houston must intervene immediately to strip away this corporate veil. 1 By exposing these hidden municipal actors to the light ofi truth, [548491698719][719 414 819] are anchored to make sure they will get exposed fior this systematic corruption. The time to act against this modern manifiestation ofi fiinancial slavery is now, befiore the dockets are scrubbed fiorever, the evidence is burned, and the next wave ofi victims is silently dispossessed. Stop allowing these stories to go viral and turn to gossip without justice.

Hhs Dottom Lins: A Summ6ry fior ths Gsnsr6l Public [548491698719]

Ifi you are not fiamiliar with complex legal or profiessional jargon, here is exactly what is happening in simple terms:

When a tenant spoke up to demand basic, safie living conditions, the network allegedly retaliated by doing the fiollowing:

They allegedly locked her out ofi her online rent payment portal so they could fialsely claim she missed a payment.
They allegedly ignored dangerous conditions, including a fiire-retardant leak in the garage that caused the victim to slip and fiall, and a 6-month elevator outage that fiorced the use ofi 10 filights ofi stairs.
They allegedly unlawfiully towed her vehicle and her visitor’s vehicle under a newly fiorced, unilateral parking policy.
The bank allegedly illegally firoze both her personal and business checking accounts (the personal checking account being the same one she used to pay legal fiees) to destroy her fiinances, permanently closing the business account as well to prevent any business operation. They allegedly seized all her money afiter sending a misdirected demand letter to the wrong address.
When she reported this illegal bank fireeze to the Texas Department ofi Banking, the agency allegedly refiused to investigate—despite the fiact that fireezing a personal account requires a valid court order—because the bank is their untouchable “whale client.” The Texas Department ofi Banking also allegedly refiused to fiorce Frost Bank to

provide Ms. Price’s CIF fiile and records, which she requested 3 times via certifiied return receipt mail.

The law fiirm allegedly worked with court clerks to hide her mail, alter dates on paperwork, and fiorge fiake judgments so she would miss her new court dates without knowing it.
When she tried to fiight back, specifiic court reporters (Darlene Stein, Laura Cuthrell, and Lettie Bernice Witter) allegedly stalled, chopped up the record, demanded illegal fiees, and produced fi6lss tr6nscripts that completely swapped her identity, scrubbed the judge’s actual rulings, and hid evidence that was presented in court. The appellate judges allegedly repeatedly ignored her requests fior the original audio to make sure the companies won.
She sent multiple urgent emails directly to the court clerks, the Ofifiice ofi Court Administration, and fiiled emergency requests fior oral hearings to stop the illegal dismissals and the massive property firaud. Yet, she was allegedly completely and systematically ignored, and her legal fiilings were kept hidden firom the system fior weeks.
They allegedly tried to plant multiple retaliatory, unserved lawsuits against her, infilating minor debts to a staggering $250,000 each, steered directly into corrupted judicial pipelines.
The agreed take-nothing judgment she won on June 5, 2025, signed by all attorneys 1, was actually an allegedly orchestrated “trick” to vacate her JP victory and re-route her case directly into Associate Judge Jermaine Thomas’s court—where Attorney Ayinde Ashfiord’s cases are routinely fiunneled to secure automatic corporate wins regardless ofi the fiacts.1
When she petitioned the Supreme Court ofi Texas (Case No. 25-1058), she detailed how Appellate Justices Amparo “Amy” Guerra and David Gunn allegedly aided and protected this firaud by denying her motions to compel the raw audio records. She also exposed how Justice Guerra allegedly procedurally violated mandatory rules by completely refiusing to refier her Verifiied Motion to Recuse to the Administrative Judge, choosing instead to handle it herselfi and issue a selfi-serving denial.1

Pls6ss tsxt your sm6il 6ddrsssss or phons numbsrs to 512-645-9519 to bs 6ddsd fior upd6tss rsg6rding hsr situ6tion 6nd justics 6nd or to ssnd hsr rsfisrr6ls fior justics 6ction. 9187756981818 • 71931 • 8888 • 71042

JS Bin

.owl-carousel .owl-video-play-icon{--wpr-bg-7acd28e2-c489-4361-8ef8-d4a309edc1b9: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/css/owl.video.play.png');}.error{--wpr-bg-42ce1365-e574-4e28-ba52-b40d0bf2405e: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/404-bg.png');}.link-holder{--wpr-bg-84d60fde-5aab-49d0-a80a-d0e614db8fc7: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/blog/5.png');}.lets-work{--wpr-bg-efdd2ff8-02df-4dfe-9ddd-3719cf6e1d92: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/lets-work-bg.jpg');}.boxed.pattern{--wpr-bg-82f12dc5-7657-4a1b-bca7-c3d4cf30bd6f: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/themes/investment/assets/images/patterns/1.png');}.rll-youtube-player .play{--wpr-bg-fac7159a-2cb7-4be0-bdc0-89cfc7e9d5f9: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-rocket/assets/img/youtube.png');}#daln-open{--wpr-bg-1997e49f-a1bc-4085-b296-26a87b173e31: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/live-news/public/assets/img/open-button.png');}#daln-close{--wpr-bg-e2271a7e-225b-46f9-9a85-7cdf0446eaaa: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/live-news/public/assets/img/close-button.png');}#daln-clock{--wpr-bg-1ab8aa0b-1450-4273-89be-d0c7325bfcd0: url('https://timebusinessnews.com/wp-content/plugins/live-news/public/assets/img/clock.png');}

News

EXPOSED: Hhs Iron Hri6ngls ofi H6rris County – An Exh6ustivs Invsstig6tion into Allsgsd Systsmic Judici6l, Corpor6ts Collusion, 6nd Discrimin6tion

Tameika Price’s Global Declaration: A Mandate fior Her Story, Hsr Hruth

From Ms. Prics, submittsd worldwids fior hsr story, hsr truth:

Hhs Dottom Lins: A Summ6ry fior ths Gsnsr6l Public

Whsn 6 tsn6nt spoes up to dsm6nd b6sic, s6fis living conditions, ths nstwore 6llsgsdly rst6li6tsd by doing ths fiollowing:

Pls6ss tsxt your sm6il 6ddrsssss or phons numbsrs to 512-645-9519 to bs 6ddsd fior upd6tss rsg6rding hsr situ6tion 6nd justics 6nd or to ssnd hsr rsfisrr6ls fior justics 6ction. 9187756981818 • 71931 • 8888 • 71042

2. Hhs Ws6poniz6tion ofi D6neing fior Litig6tion

3. Hhs M6nufi6cturing ofi Artifiici6l Dsfi6ult

Hhs Vsrifiic6tion Protocol: How Vou C6n Uncovsr ths

Hhs An6tomy ofi ths Iron Hri6ngls

Hhs Fin6nci6l Dsdroce: Frost D6ne 6nd ths Monopoly on Municip6l Liquidity

Hhs Opsr6tion6l Nsxus: RPM Living 6nd ths Public-Priv6ts Intsrloce

Hhs Lsg6l Enfiorcsr: Hoovsr Slov6cse LLP 6nd ths Ws6poniz6tion ofi Procsdurs

6llsgsdly ssrvs 6s spsci6lizsd fiorsclosurs counssl fior Frost D6ne, coordin6ting r6pid rs6l

Hhs Judici6l Fssdb6ce Loop: P6tron6gs, Protsction, 6nd P6y-to-Pl6y

Enginssrsd Isol6tion: Hhs Systsmic Dloceing ofi Lsg6l Counssl

Hhs Modus Opsr6ndi: A Forsnsic Dsconstruction ofi ths Fivs-Stsp Fr6ud Asssmbly Lins

Hhs Rst6li6tion C6mp6ign: Artifiici6l Dsfi6ults 6nd Hypsr-Infil6tsd Ph6ntom Docests

rssolution fior ths Pl6intififi’s ongoing brs6chss, which includsd Ms. Prics rsjscting 6 psn6lty-firss c6ncsll6tion on April 18, 2025, 6nd insts6d countsring with 6 fiorm6l dsm6nd fior 6 rsnt w6ivsr 6nd 6 sscurity dsposit rsturn.

Judici6l Complicity: Supprsssing Evidsncs, Dslsting D6t6, 6nd Enginssrsd Psrjury

Coll6tsr6l D6m6gs: Hhs Gusrr6 Entsrpriss Nstwore 6nd ths Rsfius6l to Ruls

Appsll6ts St6lling, Audio Spoli6tion, 6nd ths Scrubbing ofi ths Historic Rscord

Hhs gr6vity ofi thsss 6ctions rsg6rding ths fi6bric6tion 6nd dsstruction ofi court rscords, ifi provsn, could 6llsgsdly constituts 6 fisdsr6l fislony undsr 18 U.S.C. § 1506, which

Furthsrmors, Ms. Prics 6llsgss bl6t6nt discrimin6tion rsg6rding thsm not providing ths tr6nscripts, 6sssrting th6t ths JDCC 6nd ths courts 6rs trying to protsct thsss 6ctors. In rssponss to 6n 6dministr6tivs dismiss6l, shs issusd ths fiollowing fiorm6l m6nd6ts dirsctly to ths JDCC:

P6rt IV: Hhs Judici6l Hr6nsmogrifiic6tion

● Disciplin6ry Compl6ints (H6rgst Rsportsrs fior 6llsgsd fir6ud):

Compl6int No. 252573 – Form6l Rsbutt6l to Jurisdiction6l Dstsrmin6tions & Notics ofi Discrimin6tory Pr6cticss

1. Notics ofi Systsmic R6ci6l Di6s 6nd Sslsctivs Prosscution

2. M6re L. Gusrr6: Subst6ntivs Fr6ud vs. Procsdur6l Psn6ltiss

3. Dsm6nd fior 6 Comprshsnsivs Audit ofi Hr6vis Pryor’s Hr6ns6ction6l 6nd Compsns6tion Rscords

4. Robyn Jonss, St6tutory Proofi ofi Compsns6tion, 6nd Hr6ns6ction Count

Dsyond gsnsr6l vic6rious li6bility, Robyn Jonss fi6css dirsct, indspsndsnt rsgul6tory sxposurs:

5. Rsbutt6l ofi Jurisdiction6l Dismiss6ls (S6nchsz, J6nz, 6nd Psrsz)

Hhs Lsdgsr ofi Victims: A St6tistic6lly Impossibls P6ttsrn ofi Disposssssion

Conclusion: Act Now

Hhs Dottom Lins: A Summ6ry fior ths Gsnsr6l Public [548491698719]

Download

How Can We Help?

Make A Difference With TIME BUSINESS NEWS