If you are drafting an argumentative essay about a smoking ban in public places, you should present both sides of the argument and the benefits and drawbacks of a smoking ban. It is also essential to focus on the health concerns related to smoking, mainly secondhand smoke. Moreover, when presenting legal arguments, you should show that legal frameworks are already in place. Your opinion will not be strong enough if you generalize laws.
Argumentative essay on smoking in public places
If you are writing an essay writer on the ban on smoking in public places, you must provide enough information to convince readers of your side. Smoking in public places is a serious health issue, and the ban would help thousands of people. Nevertheless, you cannot make your argument against the prohibition sound personal. Instead, you must explain why a smoking ban is a good idea and outline the punishment for smoking in non-smoking areas.
Secondhand smoke is extremely harmful to people, and it makes people more prone to diseases. It also contributes to littering since cigarette packages and butts are not correctly disposed of. In addition, smoking in public places increases the likelihood of young people smoking.
Tobacco has toxic chemicals that are extremely harmful to anyone who comes into contact with it. These compounds can lead to mouth, throat, and lung cancer. Therefore, it is imperative to prohibit smoking in public places. Furthermore, tobacco is expensive in the long run, which makes it essential to make the ban stick.
Opponents of a smoking ban
Opponents of smoking bans cite various reasons for opposing the proposal. For example, many argue that smokers have no legal right to smoke in public places. In addition, they claim that smoking bans are undemocratic. For example, a smoking ban in the United Kingdom was opposed by 68% of the population. Ultimately enacted, the ban was primarily because of lobbying groups against smoking.
Many believe that smoking is dangerous and causes numerous health problems. The primary health consequences of smoking are heart problems and lung cancer, but smoking is also harmful to people around you. Passive smokers can also become ill from breathing in the smoke of other smokers. Furthermore, if a smoking ban is enacted, it will also affect those around the smoker.
Opponents of a smoking ban argue that smoking in public places pollutes the air and causes health issues. Furthermore, they claim that smokers contaminate the air and make non-smokers secondhand smokers to do my essay. On the other hand, proponents argue that smoking is a personal choice and should be permitted in public places.
Benefits of a smoking ban
Whether you agree with the benefits of a smoking ban or not, it is essential to present the case of why the smoking ban is needed. This argument is not purely based on the legislation but the underlying concerns about the health risks of secondhand smoke. It would be best if you were sure to present your idea with the proper legal framework. The arguments will not be as strong as if you are relying on generalities about laws.
Smoking is not just bad for you; it’s also bad for the environment. Smoking releases toxic chemicals into the air that harms people who breathe them in. These substances can cause cancer, especially in the lungs and mouth. A smoking ban is much more critical to public health than business interests. Moreover, it would benefit smokers and those trying to quit smoking.
A smoking ban will save the lives of both smokers and the public. Secondhand smoke is a significant contributor to sudden infant death syndrome, respiratory infections and asthma attacks in children, and heart diseases and lung cancer in adults. According to the Centers for Disease Control, secondhand smoke contains between 50 and 250 chemicals. Most of them can cause cancer.
Environmental impact of smoking
Tobacco is a global problem and has an enormous impact on the environment. It contributes to global warming and deforestation and releases toxic waste into waterways. The tobacco industry is also responsible for 0.2 percent of global carbon emissions. The cultivation of green tobacco and the manufacturing process of cigarettes add up to 84 million megatonnes of carbon annually essay writing service. These environmental impacts exacerbate the already high pressure placed on the planet’s resources and delicate ecosystems.
Despite the environmental costs of smoking, the tobacco industry contributes only a tiny percentage of global greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). It means that the effects of a ban would be incremental and limited to the selected categories. A total of nine trillion cigarettes produced worldwide in 2025 would require approximately 7.9 million hectares of agricultural land and a total of 84 Mt of CO2 equivalent emissions, which is higher than the total annual GHG emissions of countries such as Norway, South Korea, and the Netherlands.
A typical cigarette stick requires about 3.5 g of oil and 1355 m3 of water. It is equivalent to 62 years of basic hygiene needs. The annual environmental footprint of a smoker is equal to 5.1 tCO2 Equiv emissions and is approximately five times higher than the average consumer.