As web developers continue to champion an inclusive Internet where users of all abilities are able to access and interact with websites, online companies have begun turning to website accessibility tools to provide users an accessible digital experience. These tools, often referred to as accessibility widgets, offer a broad range of functions that users can manipulate to match their varying accessibility needs, such as adjusting text sizes, text spacing, or color contrast.
For apartment marketers, ensuring that their community’s website is accessible for all users makes both practical and business sense. But the unfortunate truth is that adding accessibility widgets like UserWay and accessiBe to your apartment website won’t make it fully accessible. In fact, they actually cause more problems than the ones they tout to fix. Here’s two reasons why apartment marketers should avoid them:
1. Accessibility Widgets Don’t Meet Required Compliance
While many accessibility widget companies tout that their products meet required Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) compliance, simple research shows otherwise.
WCAG is the standard by which developers improve the accessibility of websites. It also classifies a website’s accessibility on three main levels of conformance: Level A (basic web accessibility features), Level AA (the biggest and most common barriers encountered by disabled users), and Level AAA (the highest and most involved level of accessibility). Here’s more information about what website accessibility is and why apartment marketers need to incorporate it into their websites.
This is an example of UserWay’s accessibility widget on an apartment community’s website. The overlay is activated when a user clicks the button located on the lower left corner.
When comparing the features of UserWay’s widget to WCAG 2.1 standards, for example, we found that only seven of its features actually relate to the success criteria for accessibility compliance, as illustrated in the table below:
| UserWay Widget Feature | Related WCAG 2.1 Success Criteria |
| Text Spacing | WCAG 1.4.12 Text Spacing |
| Dyslexia Friendly | None |
| Bigger Text | WCAG 1.4.4: Resize Text |
| Pause Animations | WCAG 2.2.2: Pause, Stop, Hide |
| Tooltips | None |
| Highlight Links | WCAG 1.4.1: Use Of Color |
| Big Cursor | None |
| Reading Mask | None |
| Reading Guide | None |
| Contrast | WCAG 1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum) |
| Text Align | WCAG 1.4.8: Visual Presentation |
| Line Height | WCAG 1.4.12 Text Spacing |
| Screen Reader | None |
| Page Structure | None |
Comparing accesiBe’s features to WCAG 2.1 standards also shows that many aren’t related to these success criteria either:
| accessiBe Widget Feature | Related WCAG 2.1 Success Criteria |
| Color Adjustments | WCAG 1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum) |
| Content Scaling | WCAG 1.4.4: Resize Text |
| Readable Font | None |
| Highlight Titles | None |
| Highlight Links | WCAG 1.4.1: Use Of Color |
| Text Magnifier | None |
| Adjust Line Height | WCAG 1.4.12 Text Spacing |
| Adjust Letter Spacing | WCAG 1.4.12 Text Spacing |
| Adjust Font Sizing | WCAG 1.4.4: Resize Text |
| Text Alignment | WCAG 1.4.8: Visual Presentation |
| Hide Images | None |
| Mute Sounds | WCAG 1.4.2: Audio Control |
| Stop Animations | WCAG 2.2.2: Pause, Stop, Hide |
| Useful Links | None |
| Reading Mask | None |
| Highlight Hover and Focus | None |
| Change Cursor Size | None |
| Reading Guide and Mode | None |
These comparisons are but a fraction of the standards needed to be fully WCAG 2.1 compliant, which consists of over 50 success criteria.
This is not to suggest that accessibility widgets aren’t helpful just because they don’t meet all accessibility standards. But it’s important to know that these companies are being misleading in saying that they’re fully compliant. Property management companies planning to rely on accessibility widgets as a preventative measure against getting sued by a prospective resident who couldn’t fully interact with their community websites should be warned before using one.
It’s also worth pointing out the reliance apartment websites have on forms. Having prospective residents complete an online form to request an in-person showing or submit a rental application are a vital part of the leasing process. Features in these widgets fail to account for proper form accessibility, meaning that someone with a disability may not be able to complete all the steps necessary to rent one of your apartments.
Essentially, accessibility widgets provide a false sense of security.
2. Disabled Users Report Having Issues With Using Accessibility Widgets
In one study where people were asked to rate the effectiveness of accessibility widgets, 67% of all respondents, including 72% of respondents with disabilities, said accessibility widgets were not effective.
More concerningly, some users with disabilities blocked accessibility widgets from appearing on websites because of how unusable they are. One user wrote of their experience:
I know with 100% certainty, any site which has deployed
an overlay (accessibility widget) in the past year and a half
has been less usable for both my wife and me—both blind.
Accessibility widgets basically create two different versions of the same website when it would’ve been much easier to have built the website so it’s accessible for everyone. Their features are also redundant, as many of the widgets’ built-in tools could’ve been activated by simply changing a few of the computer’s and browser display settings, or replicated using screen reading technology.
Knowing that a majority of Internet users are struggling with using accessibility widgets indicates these tools fail to address the permanent, temporary, or situational disabilities that prevent them from being able to fully interact with websites.
Source: Microsoft Inclusive Design Toolkit
Keep in mind, apartment websites are full of content: photos, videos, lists of amenities, price details, floorplan blueprints, and more. For potential residents to feel comfortable making such a life-changing decision that also comes with major financial implications, they need to be able to fully consume all the information available on your website. Rather than allowing all users to do this, it appears accessibility widgets tend to make things more complicated for those who actually need them.
Conclusion
While there’s a prescient need for apartment marketers to ensure their websites can be used by everyone, they should be wary of utilizing accessibility widgets because they’re not fully compliant and disabled users say it makes interacting with a website harder.
The only possible solution to ensure your website is accessible is to employ a web developer who writes code for WCAG compliance. That’s exactly what we’re doing at RentVision. We have established a road map for our development team to have all of our apartment community websites meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines. For more information about how RentVision is trying to make renting apartments easier for everyone, read our accessibility statement.