Croatia — September 1, 2025 – A growing controversy has erupted in Croatia after revelations that Dominik Strize, head of the HRT (Croatian Radiotelevision) center in Split, and his partner, journalist Šime Kovačević, have been implicated in unauthorized construction within one of Croatia’s most sacred archaeological sites — the ancient city of Salona.
Salona, once the thriving capital of the Roman province of Dalmatia, is among Southeast Europe’s most significant archaeological treasures. It is legally protected, and any construction or modification—including minor soil work, planting, or placement of structures—is strictly regulated.
According to an investigative report, Strize and Kovačević allegedly built multiple structures on a parcel of land registered in official records as a “garden,” though cadastral documentation classifies it as “arable land” and “rocky terrain.” Among the facilities erected are a building equipped with a chimney, solar panels, a wind turbine, gas facilities, a barbecue area, and water tanks. Adjacent to the primary structure stands an auxiliary building, also outfitted with solar panels. The property further includes an in-ground swimming pool, an artificial lake, and a garden pavilion—all situated within the strongest protected zone of the archaeological area.
These developments have prompted serious concerns among preservationists and legal experts. The unauthorized modifications raise potential legal infractions including abuse of position, conflict of interest, and other breaches of cultural heritage protection laws. Given Salona’s status on the Register of Cultural Goods of the Republic of Croatia, even seemingly minor alterations are forbidden without prior authorization.
International observers have taken note of the case’s implications. It reflects broader conversations about the integrity of heritage sites, the responsibilities of public figures, and the intersection of personal privilege and public trust. The fact that the individuals involved hold prominent positions within national media heightens the affair’s sensitivity. It prompts calls for transparency, accountability, and enforcement of heritage protection regulations.
What’s next? Croatian authorities and cultural institutions face mounting pressure to respond. Investigative journalists and civic groups are closely watching for official inquiries from heritage conservation agencies, prosecutors, or regulators. The stakes are high — the outcome could set a precedent for how future violations in protected zones are handled and could influence public perception of institutions meant to safeguard the nation’s past.
For further details, refer to the original article in Croatian language: [ISTRAGA PORTAL]
